StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. API Platform vs Meteor

API Platform vs Meteor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Meteor
Meteor
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.8K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars44.8K
Forks5.3K
API Platform
API Platform
Stacks85
Followers128
Votes8

API Platform vs Meteor: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability and Performance: Meteor is a full-stack platform that provides built-in features like live updates and real-time data synchronization, making it efficient for handling real-time applications. On the other hand, API Platform is a set of tools for building web APIs with Symfony. API Platform allows for creating high-performance APIs by leveraging the power of Symfony components, which can be advantageous for handling large amounts of API requests efficiently.

  2. Technology Stack: Meteor uses Node.js as its backend runtime environment and supports front-end technologies like React, Angular, and Blaze. In contrast, API Platform utilizes PHP and Symfony components for backend development along with client-side frameworks like React or Angular for building interactive user interfaces. This difference in technology stack can influence the development choices and preferences of developers.

  3. Supported Databases: Meteor comes with MongoDB as its default database, providing a NoSQL solution for data storage. API Platform, being built on Symfony, supports a wide range of databases including MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and MongoDB. The database support in API Platform can offer more flexibility in choosing the appropriate database technology based on the project requirements.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Meteor has a strong and vibrant community that continuously contributes to the platform, resulting in a wide range of packages and resources available for developers. API Platform benefits from the Symfony community, which is known for its robust support system and extensive documentation. The choice between the two platforms may rely on the developer's familiarity with the community and ecosystem surrounding each platform.

  5. Flexibility and Customization: Meteor provides a more opinionated and integrated development environment, offering a more straightforward approach for building applications. In contrast, API Platform focuses on flexibility and customization, allowing developers to fine-tune and extend the functionality of the API using Symfony's extensive libraries and components. Depending on the project requirements and the level of customization needed, developers can opt for the platform that aligns with their development preferences.

  6. Deployment and Hosting: Meteor offers easy deployment and hosting solutions through its Galaxy hosting service, simplifying the process of launching and managing applications. API Platform, being built on Symfony, can be deployed on a variety of hosting services that support PHP applications. The choice between the two platforms may also consider the preferred deployment environment and hosting options available for seamless application deployment.

In Summary, Meteor and API Platform differ in terms of scalability and performance, technology stack, supported databases, community and ecosystem, flexibility and customization, and deployment and hosting options, catering to different development needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Meteor, API Platform

Carl-Erik
Carl-Erik

Jan 23, 2020

Decided

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

374k views374k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor
Meteor
API Platform
API Platform

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

It is a set of tools to build and consume web APIs. You can build a fully-featured hypermedia or GraphQL API in minutes. Leverage its awesome features to develop complex and high performance API-first projects. Extend or override everything you want.

Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
44.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
85
Followers
1.8K
Followers
128
Votes
1.7K
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 251
    Real-time
  • 200
    Full stack, one language
  • 183
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 155
    Data synchronization
  • 152
    Javascript
Cons
  • 5
    Does not scale well
  • 4
    Heavily CPU bound
  • 4
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
Pros
  • 1
    Microframework
  • 1
    Restful
  • 1
    Automated api-docs
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Composer
Cons
  • 2
    Easy only for easy task like normal crud on entity
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Meteor, API Platform?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot