StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Game Engines
  4. Game Development
  5. AppGameKit vs Phaser

AppGameKit vs Phaser

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phaser
Phaser
Stacks134
Followers173
Votes4
AppGameKit
AppGameKit
Stacks2
Followers12
Votes5

AppGameKit vs Phaser: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing a game development platform, it's crucial to understand the key differences between AppGameKit and Phaser to make an informed decision.

  1. Programming Language: AppGameKit uses its own programming language called AGK Script, which is a dialect of BASIC. On the other hand, Phaser is based on JavaScript and supports modern ECMAScript standards. This difference in programming languages can influence the learning curve and flexibility for developers.

  2. Target Platforms: AppGameKit allows developers to export games to multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, Windows, and Mac OS. In contrast, Phaser primarily targets web-based games, making it ideal for browser-based experiences. This difference in target platforms can impact the scope and reach of games developed using these platforms.

  3. Community Support: Phaser boasts a robust and active community that offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins to assist developers. AppGameKit, while it has a community, might not be as large or well-established as Phaser's community. The level of community support can affect the ease of development and troubleshooting for developers.

  4. Cost: AppGameKit has a paid license model, which includes a one-time fee for the software. In comparison, Phaser is an open-source framework that is free to use, making it cost-effective for developers, especially beginners or those on a tight budget. The difference in cost structure can influence the accessibility and affordability of using these platforms.

  5. Graphics Rendering: AppGameKit provides built-in 2D and 3D graphics rendering capabilities out of the box, simplifying the game development process for beginners. On the other hand, Phaser is primarily focused on 2D game development, offering advanced rendering features and extensive support for animations and sprites. The difference in graphics rendering capabilities can impact the visual richness and complexity of games created with these platforms.

Summary

In summary, AppGameKit and Phaser differ in programming language, target platforms, community support, cost structure, and graphics rendering capabilities, influencing the development experience and outcomes for game developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phaser
Phaser
AppGameKit
AppGameKit

It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools.

It is an easy to learn game development engine, ideal for Beginners, Hobbyists & Indie developers. It solves many problems caused by mobile device fragmentation. With it you can code your game once and then deploy your game to multiple platforms. Different resolutions and input systems are all easily handled by it.

-
IDE; Compiler; Broadcast direct to devices; 2D Sprites; 3D Models; Augmented Reality; 3D Physics; Shaders; Box 2D; VR; Sound; Fonts; Video; HTTP; Memblocks; Sensors; GPS; Facebook; JSON; In-app purchases; Adverts; GameCentre; Notifications; Camera; QR; Zip; Extensions;Cloud Save; Screen recording; iWatch; Android; iOS; Linux; Windows; Mac; Rasperry Pi
Statistics
Stacks
134
Stacks
2
Followers
173
Followers
12
Votes
4
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    JavaScript or TypeScript
  • 1
    Compile to iOS, Android and native apps
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    WebGL and Canvas rendering
Cons
  • 4
    No GUI
Pros
  • 2
    Good Scripting
  • 1
    Good Support System
  • 1
    Ease of Use
  • 1
    C++
Cons
  • 1
    The Coding Is Hard And Based On C++
  • 1
    Not Have A Popular Games
  • 1
    Poor Showcase
  • 1
    Very Buggy
  • 1
    Not Used By The Pro Developpers
Integrations
No integrations available
OneSignal
OneSignal
GameAnalytics
GameAnalytics
TestFairy
TestFairy
Ninject
Ninject

What are some alternatives to Phaser, AppGameKit?

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Panda3D

Panda3D

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Corona SDK

Corona SDK

It is a cross-platform framework ideal for rapidly creating apps and games for mobile devices and desktop systems. It builds rich mobile apps for iOS, Android, Kindle and Nook. Build high quality mobile apps in a fraction of the time.

Buildbox

Buildbox

It is the easiest drag and drop game maker software.Make your own games without coding and export them to iPhone, iPad, Android, Mac, PC and Microconsoles.

Amazon Lumberyard

Amazon Lumberyard

It is a game engine with no royalties or seat fees, frictionless integration with Twitch and AWS, plus much more on the horizon.

libGDX

libGDX

The framework provides an environment for rapid prototyping and fast iterations. Instead of deploying to Android/iOS/Javascript after each code change, you can run and debug your game on the desktop, natively. Desktop JVM features like code hotswapping reduce your iteration times considerably.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase