StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Askama vs Handlebars.js

Askama vs Handlebars.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308
Askama
Askama
Stacks6
Followers0
Votes0

Askama vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax: Askama uses a syntax based on Rust macros, while Handlebars.js uses a syntax based on {{}} placeholders.
  2. Performance: Askama templates are compiled at compile time, resulting in improved performance, whereas Handlebars.js templates are compiled at runtime.
  3. Features: Askama supports advanced features like template inheritance and blocks, while Handlebars.js has a simpler feature set.
  4. Error Handling: Askama provides more robust error handling mechanisms compared to Handlebars.js.
  5. Extensibility: Handlebars.js allows for easier extension and customization of helpers and partials, while Askama has limited support for these features.
  6. Language Support: Askama is specifically designed for Rust, while Handlebars.js can be used with various languages like JavaScript and Java.

In Summary, Askama offers a performance-oriented, advanced template engine with Rust-specific features, while Handlebars.js provides a more flexible and widely applicable solution for template rendering.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Askama
Askama

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

It implements a template rendering engine based on Jinja. It generates Rust code from your templates at compile time based on a user-defined struct to hold the template's context.

-
Construct templates using a familiar, easy-to-use syntax; Template code is compiled into your crate for optimal performance; Benefit from the safety provided by Rust's type system; Optional built-in support for Actix, Gotham, Iron, Rocket, tide, and warp web frameworks; Debugging features to assist you in template development; Templates must be valid UTF-8 and produce UTF-8 when rendered; Works on stable Rust
Statistics
Stacks
8.3K
Stacks
6
Followers
3.2K
Followers
0
Votes
308
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, Askama?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase