Atmosphere vs CakePHP

Overview

Atmosphere

Stacks9

Followers20

Votes10

GitHub Stars3.7K

Forks754

CakePHP

Stacks672

Followers401

Votes137

GitHub Stars8.8K

Forks3.4K

Atmosphere vs CakePHP: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Atmosphere is written in Java, making it suitable for Java-based applications. CakePHP, on the other hand, is written in PHP, making it ideal for PHP-based applications. This key difference in programming languages impacts the development approach and compatibility with different systems.
Community Support: CakePHP has a larger and more active community compared to Atmosphere. This means that CakePHP users have access to more resources, tutorials, and forums for problem-solving and collaboration. Conversely, Atmosphere users might find it challenging to find as much support and guidance within the community.
Database Support: CakePHP provides built-in support for popular databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and others, offering developers more flexibility and options for database management. On the other hand, Atmosphere may have limited native support for certain databases, which could restrict developers in their database choices.
Maturity and Stability: CakePHP is a more mature and stable framework with a longer history of development and refinement. This can be beneficial in terms of reliability and established best practices. Atmosphere, being relatively newer, may have certain stability issues or evolving features that are still in the process of refinement.
Modularity and Flexibility: Atmosphere is designed to be a highly modular and flexible framework, emphasizing the ability to mix and match components and libraries based on project requirements. CakePHP, while also offering flexibility, may have a more structured and opinionated approach to development, which can be advantageous for maintaining consistency and code quality.
Performance and Scalability: CakePHP is known for its performance optimization features, allowing for efficient execution of applications and better scalability. Atmosphere, while capable of good performance, might require additional configurations or optimizations to match the level of scalability offered by CakePHP.

In Summary, Atmosphere and CakePHP differ in their programming language, community support, database support, maturity, modularity, and performance characteristics, influencing the choice of framework for web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Atmosphere, CakePHP

Michael

Developer at Fleet-Nomics

Sep 11, 2022

Needs adviceon

Bubble

CodeIgniter

CakePHP

Hi all, I need to create a simple IoT interface application that connects the end device API with a GeoTab API. I am considering using Bubble due to its simple interface and configuration tools, but I fear it's too simple. We will want to add features and new devices as we grow - I was thinking of using CodeIgniter or CakePHP on a hosted site for the application. Must support JCOM encoding between the two APIs and there is no need for a separate interface as GeoTab already has one; we are just connecting and pushing data. Thoughts?

47.4k views47.4k

Comments

Juan Jose

May 8, 2021

Needs adviceon

PostgreSQL

Hi, Which tool will you recommend:

I need to build a web application, oriented to small businesses, like a small ERP. It will have intensive use of Sql to access a PostgreSQL database. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory.

If you think another tool will be better, please let that know.

Thanks a lot

69.6k views69.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Atmosphere	CakePHP
The Atmosphere Framework contains client and server side components for building Asynchronous Web Applications. The majority of popular frameworks are either supporting Atmosphere or supported natively by the framework. The Atmosphere Framework supports all major Browsers and Servers.	It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.
-	Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.7K	GitHub Stars 8.8K
GitHub Forks 754	GitHub Forks 3.4K
Stacks 9	Stacks 672
Followers 20	Followers 401
Votes 10	Votes 137
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 JVM 3 Cross-Browse 2 WebSockets 2 Open source	Pros 35 Open source 25 Really rapid framework 19 Good code organization 13 Flexibility 10 Security best practices Cons 1 Follows Good Programming Practices 1 Robust Baking Tool
Integrations
Java	PHP

What are some alternatives to Atmosphere, CakePHP?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Atmosphere vs CakePHP: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Atmosphere is written in Java, making it suitable for Java-based applications. CakePHP, on the other hand, is written in PHP, making it ideal for PHP-based applications. This key difference in programming languages impacts the development approach and compatibility with different systems.
Community Support: CakePHP has a larger and more active community compared to Atmosphere. This means that CakePHP users have access to more resources, tutorials, and forums for problem-solving and collaboration. Conversely, Atmosphere users might find it challenging to find as much support and guidance within the community.
Database Support: CakePHP provides built-in support for popular databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and others, offering developers more flexibility and options for database management. On the other hand, Atmosphere may have limited native support for certain databases, which could restrict developers in their database choices.
Maturity and Stability: CakePHP is a more mature and stable framework with a longer history of development and refinement. This can be beneficial in terms of reliability and established best practices. Atmosphere, being relatively newer, may have certain stability issues or evolving features that are still in the process of refinement.
Modularity and Flexibility: Atmosphere is designed to be a highly modular and flexible framework, emphasizing the ability to mix and match components and libraries based on project requirements. CakePHP, while also offering flexibility, may have a more structured and opinionated approach to development, which can be advantageous for maintaining consistency and code quality.
Performance and Scalability: CakePHP is known for its performance optimization features, allowing for efficient execution of applications and better scalability. Atmosphere, while capable of good performance, might require additional configurations or optimizations to match the level of scalability offered by CakePHP.

Atmosphere vs CakePHP

Overview