StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Atmosphere vs FuelPHP

Atmosphere vs FuelPHP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Stacks9
Followers20
Votes10
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks754
FuelPHP
FuelPHP
Stacks23
Followers34
Votes5

Atmosphere vs FuelPHP: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Atmosphere is a real-time application server that follows a client/server architecture, while FuelPHP is a PHP framework based on the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture.
  2. Modularity: Atmosphere provides a modular approach to building applications with reusable components, whereas FuelPHP has a more structured and integrated library system.
  3. Real-time capabilities: Atmosphere is designed for real-time web applications with features like WebSockets and Server-Sent Events, while FuelPHP focuses on traditional web application development.
  4. Community support: FuelPHP has a larger community and more third-party plugins available, making it easier to find solutions to common problems, whereas Atmosphere has a smaller community but focuses more on real-time application development.
  5. Performance: Atmosphere is optimized for handling high-performance real-time applications with features like clustering and load balancing, while FuelPHP may not be as efficient in handling real-time applications.
  6. Learning curve: FuelPHP has a steeper learning curve due to its more structured framework, whereas Atmosphere's simpler architecture may be easier for beginners to pick up quickly.

In Summary, Atmosphere and FuelPHP have key differences in architecture, modularity, real-time capabilities, community support, performance, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
FuelPHP
FuelPHP

The Atmosphere Framework contains client and server side components for building Asynchronous Web Applications. The majority of popular frameworks are either supporting Atmosphere or supported natively by the framework. The Atmosphere Framework supports all major Browsers and Servers.

FuelPHP is a fast, lightweight PHP 5.4 framework. In an age where frameworks are a dime a dozen, We believe that FuelPHP will stand out in the crowd. It will do this by combining all the things you love about the great frameworks out there, while getting rid of the bad.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
754
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
9
Stacks
23
Followers
20
Followers
34
Votes
10
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    JVM
  • 3
    Cross-Browse
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    WebSockets
Pros
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Fast and secure
  • 1
    Supports HMVC
Integrations
Java
Java
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Atmosphere, FuelPHP?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase