StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Atmosphere vs Kohana

Atmosphere vs Kohana

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Stacks9
Followers20
Votes10
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks754
Kohana
Kohana
Stacks57
Followers42
Votes15
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks422

Atmosphere vs Kohana: What are the differences?

<Atmosphere and Kohana are both web development frameworks, and understanding their key differences can help developers make informed decisions on which to use.>

  1. Programming Language: Atmosphere is primarily based on Java and aims to provide real-time capabilities for web applications, while Kohana is a PHP framework designed for building web applications quickly and easily.
  2. Architecture: Atmosphere follows the architecture of asynchronous programming, allowing for events to be handled independently, while Kohana follows a traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture for organizing code and separating concerns.
  3. Community Support: Kohana has a smaller community compared to Atmosphere, which means that finding resources, documentation, and support may be more challenging for developers using Kohana.
  4. Extensibility: Atmosphere offers a rich set of extensions and plugins that enhance its functionality and allow developers to customize their applications further, while Kohana has fewer built-in extensions and relies more on third-party libraries for additional features.
  5. Performance: Atmosphere is known for its high performance and scalability, making it a preferred choice for applications that require real-time updates and high traffic handling, whereas Kohana may not perform as efficiently in these scenarios.
  6. Learning Curve: Kohana is considered more beginner-friendly with its simple and intuitive syntax, making it easier for developers new to web development to get started, while Atmosphere may have a steeper learning curve due to its asynchronous programming model and advanced features.

In Summary, knowing the key differences between Atmosphere and Kohana in terms of programming language, architecture, community support, extensibility, performance, and learning curve can help developers choose the right framework for their web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Kohana
Kohana

The Atmosphere Framework contains client and server side components for building Asynchronous Web Applications. The majority of popular frameworks are either supporting Atmosphere or supported natively by the framework. The Atmosphere Framework supports all major Browsers and Servers.

Kohana is an elegant, open source, and object oriented HMVC framework built using PHP5, by a team of volunteers. It aims to be swift, secure, and small.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Forks
754
GitHub Forks
422
Stacks
9
Stacks
57
Followers
20
Followers
42
Votes
10
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    JVM
  • 3
    Cross-Browse
  • 2
    WebSockets
  • 2
    Open source
Pros
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    Efficient and lightweight
  • 3
    Cascading filesystem
  • 2
    Easy to understand PHP framework
  • 2
    Extensible
Integrations
Java
Java
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Atmosphere, Kohana?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase