StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Atmosphere vs Masonite

Atmosphere vs Masonite

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Stacks9
Followers20
Votes10
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks754
Masonite
Masonite
Stacks13
Followers27
Votes6
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks133

Atmosphere vs Masonite: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Architecture**: Atmosphere is a real-time framework that operates on a message-passing model, while Masonite is a robust and modern Python web framework.
2. **Components**: Atmosphere primarily focuses on building real-time applications using WebSockets and Server-Send Events, whereas Masonite offers a complete set of tools for building web applications, including database ORM, authentication, and routing systems.
3. **Deployment**: Atmosphere applications are typically deployed as standalone server instances, while Masonite applications can be deployed on various platforms, including traditional servers and cloud services.
4. **Community and Support**: Atmosphere has a smaller and more specialized user base due to its focus on real-time applications, whereas Masonite has a larger community and more extensive documentation and support resources available.
5. **Scalability**: Atmosphere is more suitable for building highly scalable real-time applications with large numbers of concurrent connections, while Masonite is well-suited for building traditional web applications with more standard traffic patterns.
6. **Learning Curve**: Masonite has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and more complex architecture, while Atmosphere is more straightforward to use for developers familiar with real-time application development.

In Summary, Atmosphere and Masonite differ in architecture, components, deployment options, community support, scalability, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Masonite
Masonite

The Atmosphere Framework contains client and server side components for building Asynchronous Web Applications. The majority of popular frameworks are either supporting Atmosphere or supported natively by the framework. The Atmosphere Framework supports all major Browsers and Servers.

A web framework that is extremely simple and changes what it means for a batteries included Python framework. Intuitive and elegant from installation to deployment.

-
Easily send emails with the Mail Provider and the SMTP and Mailgun drivers.;Send websocket requests from your server with the Broadcast Provider and Pusher and Ably drivers.;IOC container and auto resolving dependency injection.;Service Providers to easily add functionality to the framework.;Extremely simple static files configured and ready to go.;Active Record style ORM called Orator.;An extremely useful command line tool called craft commands.;Extremely extendable.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
754
GitHub Forks
133
Stacks
9
Stacks
13
Followers
20
Followers
27
Votes
10
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Cross-Browse
  • 3
    JVM
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    WebSockets
Pros
  • 4
    The Easiest python Framework TO Work With
  • 1
    Easy to transition from Laravel
  • 1
    Clear documentation
Integrations
Java
Java
Python
Python
GitHub
GitHub
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Atmosphere, Masonite?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase