Aura vs Mojolicious: What are the differences?
Developers describe Aura as "Modern tools for modern applications". The Aura project centers around a collection of high-quality, well-tested, semantically versioned, standards-compliant, independent library packages that can be used in any codebase. On the other hand, Mojolicious is detailed as "Perl real-time web framework". Back in the early days of the web, many people learned Perl because of a wonderful Perl library called CGI. It was simple enough to get started without knowing much about the language and powerful enough to keep you going, learning by doing was much fun. While most of the techniques used are outdated now, the idea behind it is not. Mojolicious is a new attempt at implementing this idea using state of the art technology.
Aura and Mojolicious can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Aura and Mojolicious are both open source tools. Aura with 2.99K GitHub stars and 269 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Mojolicious with 2.12K GitHub stars and 498 GitHub forks.
Kivvik, Klubup, and RoundTable are some of the popular companies that use Aura, whereas Mojolicious is used by Binary.com, WebbyLab, and MynewMD. Aura has a broader approval, being mentioned in 9 company stacks & 4 developers stacks; compared to Mojolicious, which is listed in 9 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.
What is Aura?
What is Mojolicious?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Aura?
What are the cons of using Mojolicious?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Web part is fully written on top of Mojolicious. Thanks Sebastian Riedel and all the contributors for the great framework!
Веб бэкенд написан полностью на Mojolicious. Спасибо Риделю и всем участникам за этот фреймворк!