AutoGluon vs PyTorch

Overview

PyTorch

Stacks1.6K

Followers1.5K

Votes43

GitHub Stars94.7K

Forks25.8K

AutoGluon

Stacks8

Followers38

Votes0

AutoGluon vs PyTorch: What are the differences?

Model Development: AutoGluon is an automated machine learning (AutoML) framework that provides a high-level interface for developers to create machine learning models with minimal code, while PyTorch is a deep learning framework that allows for fine-grained control and customization of model development. AutoGluon simplifies the model development process by automatically selecting and tuning the best model for a given task, whereas PyTorch provides more flexibility for researchers and experts to develop their own custom models.
Ease of Use: AutoGluon is designed to be user-friendly, requiring minimal user intervention and expertise in machine learning. It abstracts away many of the complex steps involved in training and tuning models, making it suitable for users with limited machine learning knowledge. PyTorch, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of machine learning concepts and algorithms, as it provides a lower-level interface and more fine-grained control over the model development process.
Performance: AutoGluon is optimized for achieving high performance and scalability in model training. It leverages various techniques such as stacking multiple models and ensemble learning to improve prediction accuracy. PyTorch, as a deep learning framework, is highly optimized for training deep neural networks on large-scale datasets. It provides low-level access to GPU acceleration and allows for distributed training, making it suitable for handling computationally intensive tasks.
Algorithm Support: AutoGluon supports a wide range of machine learning algorithms, including decision trees, gradient boosting, random forests, and deep learning models. It automatically selects the most appropriate algorithm for a given task based on the provided data. PyTorch specializes in deep learning and provides an extensive collection of pre-built deep learning algorithms and modules, making it ideal for tasks such as image recognition, natural language processing, and speech recognition.
Community and Ecosystem: PyTorch has a large and active community of developers and researchers, with a rich ecosystem of libraries, tools, and pre-trained models. It is widely used in both academia and industry, and there is extensive support and documentation available. AutoGluon, while gaining popularity, does not have the same level of community and ecosystem as PyTorch. It is a relatively newer framework and has a smaller user base and less extensive resources available.
Customizability: PyTorch offers a high degree of customizability, allowing users to define and modify every aspect of a model, including the neural architecture, loss functions, and optimization algorithms. This makes it suitable for researchers and experts who require fine-grained control over the model development process. AutoGluon, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use and automation, limiting the level of customizability available to users. It is designed to provide pre-configured defaults and automated features for most tasks, sacrificing some flexibility for simplicity.

In Summary, AutoGluon is an automated machine learning framework that simplifies the model development process with minimal user intervention, while PyTorch provides more flexibility and customization options for researchers and experts. AutoGluon is designed for ease of use and performance optimization, supporting a wide range of machine learning algorithms, while PyTorch specializes in deep learning and offers extensive customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on PyTorch, AutoGluon

Adithya

Student at PES UNIVERSITY

May 11, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning some basic machine learning concepts. So which of the following frameworks is better to use: Keras / TensorFlow/PyTorch. I have prior knowledge in python(and even pandas), java, js and C. It would be nice if something could point out the advantages of one over the other especially in terms of resources, documentation and flexibility. Also, could someone tell me where to find the right resources or tutorials for the above frameworks? Thanks in advance, hope you are doing well!!

107k views107k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

PyTorch	AutoGluon
PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.	It automates machine learning tasks enabling you to easily achieve strong predictive performance in your applications. With just a few lines of code, you can train and deploy high-accuracy deep learning models on image, text, and tabular data.
Tensor computation (like numpy) with strong GPU acceleration;Deep Neural Networks built on a tape-based autograd system	Quickly prototype deep learning solutions for your data with few lines of code; Leverage automatic hyperparameter tuning, model selection / architecture search, and data processing; Automatically utilize state-of-the-art deep learning techniques without expert knowledge; Easily improve existing bespoke models and data pipelines, or customize AutoGluon for your use-case
Statistics
GitHub Stars 94.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 25.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 8
Followers 1.5K	Followers 38
Votes 43	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 15 Easy to use 11 Developer Friendly 10 Easy to debug 7 Sometimes faster than TensorFlow Cons 3 Lots of code 1 It eats poop	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python	Python Linux

What are some alternatives to PyTorch, AutoGluon?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

PredictionIO

PredictionIO is an open source machine learning server for software developers to create predictive features, such as personalization, recommendation and content discovery.

Related Comparisons

AutoGluon vs PyTorch: What are the differences?

Model Development: AutoGluon is an automated machine learning (AutoML) framework that provides a high-level interface for developers to create machine learning models with minimal code, while PyTorch is a deep learning framework that allows for fine-grained control and customization of model development. AutoGluon simplifies the model development process by automatically selecting and tuning the best model for a given task, whereas PyTorch provides more flexibility for researchers and experts to develop their own custom models.
Ease of Use: AutoGluon is designed to be user-friendly, requiring minimal user intervention and expertise in machine learning. It abstracts away many of the complex steps involved in training and tuning models, making it suitable for users with limited machine learning knowledge. PyTorch, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of machine learning concepts and algorithms, as it provides a lower-level interface and more fine-grained control over the model development process.
Performance: AutoGluon is optimized for achieving high performance and scalability in model training. It leverages various techniques such as stacking multiple models and ensemble learning to improve prediction accuracy. PyTorch, as a deep learning framework, is highly optimized for training deep neural networks on large-scale datasets. It provides low-level access to GPU acceleration and allows for distributed training, making it suitable for handling computationally intensive tasks.
Algorithm Support: AutoGluon supports a wide range of machine learning algorithms, including decision trees, gradient boosting, random forests, and deep learning models. It automatically selects the most appropriate algorithm for a given task based on the provided data. PyTorch specializes in deep learning and provides an extensive collection of pre-built deep learning algorithms and modules, making it ideal for tasks such as image recognition, natural language processing, and speech recognition.
Community and Ecosystem: PyTorch has a large and active community of developers and researchers, with a rich ecosystem of libraries, tools, and pre-trained models. It is widely used in both academia and industry, and there is extensive support and documentation available. AutoGluon, while gaining popularity, does not have the same level of community and ecosystem as PyTorch. It is a relatively newer framework and has a smaller user base and less extensive resources available.
Customizability: PyTorch offers a high degree of customizability, allowing users to define and modify every aspect of a model, including the neural architecture, loss functions, and optimization algorithms. This makes it suitable for researchers and experts who require fine-grained control over the model development process. AutoGluon, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use and automation, limiting the level of customizability available to users. It is designed to provide pre-configured defaults and automated features for most tasks, sacrificing some flexibility for simplicity.

AutoGluon vs PyTorch

Overview