Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Awesomplete
Awesomplete

45
3
+ 1
2
Blueprint
Blueprint

18
43
+ 1
7
Add tool

Blueprint vs Awesomplete: What are the differences?

Developers describe Blueprint as "A React UI toolkit for the web". Blueprint is a React UI toolkit for the web. It is optimized for building complex, data-dense web interfaces for desktop applications. If you rely heavily on mobile interactions and are looking for a mobile-first UI toolkit, this may not be for you. On the other hand, Awesomplete is detailed as "*JavaScript library to create an autocomplete widget *". It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

Blueprint and Awesomplete can be categorized as "Javascript UI Libraries" tools.

Blueprint is an open source tool with 14.7K GitHub stars and 1.33K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Blueprint's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Awesomplete?

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

What is Blueprint?

Blueprint is a React UI toolkit for the web. It is optimized for building complex, data-dense web interfaces for desktop applications. If you rely heavily on mobile interactions and are looking for a mobile-first UI toolkit, this may not be for you.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Awesomplete?
Why do developers choose Blueprint?
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Awesomplete?
      What companies use Blueprint?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Awesomplete?
      What tools integrate with Blueprint?
      What are some alternatives to Awesomplete and Blueprint?
      jQuery
      jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.
      React
      Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
      jQuery UI
      Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.
      AngularJS
      AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML鈥檚 syntax to express your application鈥檚 components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.
      Vue.js
      It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Awesomplete and Blueprint
      Tobias Widmer
      Tobias Widmer
      CTO at Onedot | 4 upvotes 78K views
      atOnedotOnedot
      React
      React
      Redux
      Redux
      Scala
      Scala
      TypeScript
      TypeScript
      Cassandra
      Cassandra
      Apache Spark
      Apache Spark
      Amazon S3
      Amazon S3
      Blueprint
      Blueprint
      npm
      npm

      Onedot is building an automated data preparation service using probabilistic and statistical methods including artificial intelligence (AI). From the beginning, having a stable foundation while at the same time being able to iterate quickly was very important to us. Due to the nature of compute workloads we face, the decision for a functional programming paradigm and a scalable cluster model was a no-brainer. We started playing with Apache Spark very early on, when the platform was still in its infancy. As a storage backend, we first used Cassandra, but found out that it was not the optimal choice for our workloads (lots of rather smallish datasets, data pipelines with considerable complexity, etc.). In the end, we migrated dataset storage to Amazon S3 which proved to be much more adequate to our case. In the frontend, we bet on more traditional frameworks like React/Redux.js, Blueprint and a number of common npm packages of our universe. Because of the very positive experience with Scala (in particular the ability to write things very expressively, use immutability across the board, etc.) we settled with TypeScript in the frontend. In our opinion, a very good decision. Nowadays, transpiling is a common thing, so we thought why not introduce the same type-safety and mathematical rigour to the user interface?

      See more
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Awesomplete and Blueprint
      No reviews found
      How developers use Awesomplete and Blueprint
      Avatar of rahulsmehta
      rahulsmehta uses BlueprintBlueprint

      Blueprint has awesome SPA components and a fantastic icon set that you can use to build a very rich UI for code authoring applications.

      How much does Awesomplete cost?
      How much does Blueprint cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      Pricing unavailable
      News about Awesomplete
      More news
      News about Blueprint
      More news