Awesomplete vs cell: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Awesomplete and cell are both libraries that provide autocomplete functionality to text input fields on a website. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that make each unique.

## 1. Autocomplete Mechanism:
Awesomplete uses a simple mechanism where it displays a dropdown list of suggestions based on a static list of options. In contrast, cell employs a more complex mechanism that allows for dynamic suggestions to be fetched from a server based on user input.

## 2. Customization Options:
In terms of customization, Awesomplete offers limited options for styling and behavior modification. On the other hand, cell provides a wide range of customization options such as themes, animations, and search algorithms to tailor the autocomplete experience to specific needs.

## 3. Size and Dependencies:
Awesomplete is a lightweight library with a small footprint and minimal dependencies, making it easy to integrate into existing projects without significantly impacting performance. In comparison, cell is a more feature-rich library that may require additional dependencies and is larger in size, potentially affecting load times.

## 4. Browser Compatibility:
While both Awesomplete and cell are designed to work across modern web browsers, Awesomplete has a reputation for better compatibility with older browsers due to its simple implementation and minimal use of advanced features that could cause issues on outdated browsers.

## 5. Licensing:
One notable difference between Awesomplete and cell is their licensing terms. Awesomplete is released under the MIT license, allowing for greater flexibility in usage and modification, whereas cell is released under a different license that may have more restrictive terms for certain use cases.

## 6. Community and Support:
When it comes to community support and documentation, Awesomplete has been around for longer and has a larger user base, resulting in more readily available resources and tutorials. On the other hand, cell may have a smaller user community and less extensive documentation, potentially requiring more effort to troubleshoot issues or implement advanced features.

## Summary
In summary, Awesomplete and cell offer autocomplete functionality for text input fields on websites, but differ in their autocomplete mechanism, customization options, size and dependencies, browser compatibility, licensing terms, and community support.