StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs Essential React

Awesomplete vs Essential React

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Essential React
Essential React
Stacks2
Followers16
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks131
Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607

Awesomplete vs Essential React: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Integration with React Components: Awesomplete is a standalone vanilla JavaScript library that can be easily integrated into any web application, while Essential React is specifically designed to work with React components, providing a more seamless integration with React applications.

  2. Customization Options: Awesomplete offers limited customization options compared to Essential React, which provides a wide range of customization features such as theming, styling, and behavior customization, allowing developers to tailor the autocomplete functionality to meet their specific requirements.

  3. Accessibility Features: Essential React prioritizes accessibility by offering built-in support for ensuring that the autocomplete functionality is accessible to all users, including those using assistive technologies, while Awesomplete may require additional steps to be fully accessible.

  4. Performance Optimization: Essential React includes performance optimization features, such as virtual scrolling and lazy loading, to efficiently handle large datasets, making it more suitable for applications requiring high performance in autocomplete functionality compared to Awesomplete.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: Essential React benefits from a larger community and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find resources, support, and examples for implementing and troubleshooting complex autocomplete features compared to Awesomplete.

  6. Dependency Management: Awesomplete has minimal dependencies and can be used independently, while Essential React has dependencies on React and other related libraries, which may add complexity to the project setup and management when integrating the autocomplete feature into a React application.

In Summary, Awesomplete and Essential React differ in terms of integration with React components, customization options, accessibility features, performance optimization, community support and documentation, and dependency management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Essential React
Essential React
Awesomplete
Awesomplete

A minimal skeleton for building testable React apps using ES6.

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

Minimal tooling;ES6 with support for IE 8; Testability;Composable JSX over templates;Logic-driven inline styles over stylesheets
Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Forks
131
GitHub Forks
607
Stacks
2
Stacks
61
Followers
16
Followers
8
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
Integrations
React
React
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Essential React, Awesomplete?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase