StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs jQWidgets

Awesomplete vs jQWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Awesomplete vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

Developers describe Awesomplete as "*JavaScript library to create an autocomplete widget *". It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers. On the other hand, jQWidgets is detailed as "A javascript library framework for building modern responsive web sites and mobile web applications that work on any device". It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

Awesomplete and jQWidgets can be primarily classified as "Javascript UI Libraries" tools.

Some of the features offered by Awesomplete are:

  • Lightweight
  • Customizable
  • Simple

On the other hand, jQWidgets provides the following key features:

  • Works Across Devices & Browsers
  • Web Standards Compliant
  • Optimized for Performance

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
607
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
61
Stacks
14
Followers
8
Followers
49
Votes
2
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Awesomplete, jQWidgets?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase