StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs React Engine

Awesomplete vs React Engine

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607
React Engine
React Engine
Stacks5
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks129

Awesomplete vs React Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Awesomplete and React Engine.

  1. Search Functionality: Awesomplete is a lightweight, ultra-flexible, and extensible autocomplete widget whereas React Engine is a rendering engine that works seamlessly with React components. While Awesomplete focuses on providing a robust search functionality for input fields, React Engine is mainly used for rendering React components efficiently.

  2. Dependencies: Awesomplete has minimal dependencies and can be easily integrated into any web project without adding unnecessary bloat. On the other hand, React Engine requires the React library to function properly, making it a more specialized tool for React-based applications.

  3. Component Architecture: Awesomplete is primarily designed for enhancing user experience in input fields, offering features like auto-complete, filtering, and suggestion lists. In contrast, React Engine focuses on optimizing the rendering process of React components, improving performance and scalability of complex UI structures.

  4. Ease of Use: Awesomplete is straightforward to set up and customize, making it a user-friendly choice for developers looking to add autocomplete functionality to their web forms. React Engine, while powerful, may require a deeper understanding of React's component lifecycle and virtual DOM to leverage its full potential.

  5. Community Support: Awesomplete has a smaller community compared to React Engine, which is backed by the extensive React ecosystem. This means that developers using React Engine can benefit from a wider range of resources, documentation, and support when working on their projects.

  6. Performance Impact: Awesomplete offers fast and efficient autocomplete functionality with minimal performance impact on the overall web application. In contrast, React Engine may introduce additional overhead due to its rendering optimization features, which could be a consideration for projects with strict performance requirements.

In Summary, the key differences between Awesomplete and React Engine lie in their focus on search functionality, dependencies, component architecture, ease of use, community support, and performance impact.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
React Engine
React Engine

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

a composite render engine for universal (isomorphic) express apps to render both plain react views and react-router views

Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Forks
607
GitHub Forks
129
Stacks
61
Stacks
5
Followers
8
Followers
11
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
No community feedback yet
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
React
React
ExpressJS
ExpressJS

What are some alternatives to Awesomplete, React Engine?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase