StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs Relay

Awesomplete vs Relay

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Relay Framework
Relay Framework
Stacks214
Followers177
Votes1
GitHub Stars18.9K
Forks1.9K
Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607

Awesomplete vs Relay: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Initialization: Awesomplete is primarily a lightweight, flexible, and extensible javascript library for autocompleting input fields, while Relay is a JavaScript framework for building data-driven React applications. Awesomplete is more focused on enhancing the user experience with easy autocomplete functionality, whereas Relay provides a structured way to manage and fetch data for React components.

  2. Data Fetching: Awesomplete does not handle data fetching from servers or APIs; it mainly focuses on providing suggestions based on the available options. In contrast, Relay excels in efficiently fetching and managing data from various sources and organizing it for React components to use seamlessly.

  3. Complexity: Awesomplete is straightforward to implement and lightweight as it aims to provide a simple autocomplete feature without added complexity. On the other hand, Relay is a more sophisticated tool that offers advanced capabilities like query batching, pagination, and data normalization, making it suitable for complex applications with extensive data requirements.

  4. Component Interaction: With Awesomplete, the interaction is limited to the autocomplete input field, providing suggestions as users type. In contrast, Relay focuses on managing data flow across components in a React application, enabling efficient communication and updates between different parts of the UI based on the fetched data.

  5. Community Support: Awesomplete, being a specialized library for autocomplete functionality, may have a smaller community compared to Relay, which is backed by the robust ecosystem of the React community. This difference can affect the availability of resources, documentation, and community-driven extensions or plugins for each tool.

  6. Use Cases: Awesomplete is suitable for scenarios where enhancing user input with autocomplete suggestions is the primary requirement, such as search bars or form fields. On the other hand, Relay is more suited for complex, data-intensive applications that require efficient data management and synchronization between components, especially in large-scale React projects.

In Summary, <Write summary here>

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Relay Framework
Relay Framework
Awesomplete
Awesomplete

Never again communicate with your data store using an imperative API. Simply declare your data requirements using GraphQL and let Relay figure out how and when to fetch your data.

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

Build data driven apps; Declarative style; Mutate data on the client and server
Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.9K
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
607
Stacks
214
Stacks
61
Followers
177
Followers
8
Votes
1
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Relay Modern
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
Integrations
No integrations available
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Relay Framework, Awesomplete?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase