StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs VueStrap

Awesomplete vs VueStrap

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607
VueStrap
VueStrap
Stacks3
Followers24
Votes2
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks919

Awesomplete vs VueStrap: What are the differences?

  1. Implementation: Awesomplete is a vanilla JavaScript library that provides autocomplete functionality, while VueStrap is a collection of Bootstrap components specifically built for Vue.js applications.
  2. Customization: Awesomplete offers limited customization options compared to VueStrap, which allows for more flexibility in styling and functionality modification.
  3. Dependencies: Awesomplete has no external dependencies, making it lightweight and easy to integrate, whereas VueStrap requires Vue.js and Bootstrap as dependencies.
  4. Compatibility: Awesomplete can be used with any JavaScript framework or library, whereas VueStrap is specifically tailored for Vue.js applications.
  5. Community Support: VueStrap has a larger community and more active development, providing better documentation and support compared to Awesomplete.
  6. Ease of Use: Awesomplete is simpler and easier to implement for basic autocomplete functionality, while VueStrap offers more advanced features that may require additional setup and configuration.

In Summary, Awesomplete is a lightweight vanilla JavaScript autocomplete library with limited customization options, while VueStrap is a collection of Bootstrap components designed for Vue.js applications with more advanced features and customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
VueStrap
VueStrap

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

Bootstrap components built with Vue.js

Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
607
GitHub Forks
919
Stacks
61
Stacks
3
Followers
8
Followers
24
Votes
2
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
Pros
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Bootstrap v3.x
Cons
  • 1
    No longer maintained
  • 1
    Discontinued
  • 1
    No disable option for datepicker
  • 1
    Limited styling
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Awesomplete, VueStrap?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase