StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Batch vs Knative

AWS Batch vs Knative

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Stacks84
Followers251
Votes6
Knative
Knative
Stacks86
Followers342
Votes21
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks1.2K

AWS Batch vs Knative: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Model: AWS Batch is a managed service that allows users to run batch computing workloads while Knative is an open-source serverless platform that provides a runtime environment to deploy and run applications. The key difference here is that AWS Batch is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Knative is an open-source project that can be run on any cloud provider or even on-premises.

  2. Workload Types: AWS Batch is specifically designed for running batch computing workloads, which are typically long-running tasks that do not require immediate response. On the other hand, Knative is a serverless platform that supports different types of workloads, including batch, event-driven, and long-running tasks. This means that Knative offers a more versatile platform for running various types of workloads compared to AWS Batch.

  3. Auto Scaling: AWS Batch provides built-in capabilities for automatic scaling of compute resources based on the workload demands. It allows users to define and configure compute environment scaling rules, which are then automatically applied to ensure that the required resources are available for running batch jobs. Knative, on the other hand, does not provide automatic scaling out of the box. Users need to manually configure the scaling behavior using Kubernetes Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) or other mechanisms.

  4. Integration with Container Orchestrators: AWS Batch seamlessly integrates with the Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Kubernetes, allowing users to leverage their existing container orchestration capabilities. It provides a simplified interface for managing batch workloads while benefiting from the scalability and reliability features of ECS or Kubernetes. Knative, however, is built on top of Kubernetes and provides a higher-level abstraction for deploying and running serverless workloads. It eliminates the need for directly interacting with Kubernetes and provides a more developer-friendly experience.

  5. Cost Model: AWS Batch follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the usage of compute resources, storage, and data transfer. The pricing is transparent and predictable, allowing users to estimate their costs in advance. Knative, being an open-source project, does not have any direct cost associated with it. However, users need to consider the underlying infrastructure costs if they choose to run Knative on a cloud provider.

  6. Vendor Lock-in: AWS Batch is a proprietary service offered by Amazon Web Services, which means that users are tied to the AWS ecosystem and cannot easily migrate their workloads to another cloud provider. Knative, being an open-source project, provides more flexibility and freedom for users to deploy and run their workloads on different cloud providers or even on-premises. This reduces the vendor lock-in risk and allows users to choose the best platform for their specific needs.

In Summary, AWS Batch is a managed service designed for running batch computing workloads, while Knative is an open-source serverless platform that supports various types of workloads. The key differences include the deployment model, workload types, auto scaling capabilities, integration with container orchestrators, cost model, and vendor lock-in risk.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Knative
Knative

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

-
Serving - Scale to zero, request-driven compute model; Build - Cloud-native source to container orchestration; Events - Universal subscription, delivery and management of events; Serverless add-on on GKE - Enable GCP managed serverless stack on Kubernetes
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
84
Stacks
86
Followers
251
Followers
342
Votes
6
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Containerized
  • 3
    Scalable
Cons
  • 3
    More overhead than lambda
  • 1
    Image management
Pros
  • 5
    Portability
  • 4
    Autoscaling
  • 3
    Eventing
  • 3
    Open source
  • 3
    On top of Kubernetes
Integrations
No integrations available
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine

What are some alternatives to AWS Batch, Knative?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

Fission

Fission

Write short-lived functions in any language, and map them to HTTP requests (or other event triggers). Deploy functions instantly with one command. There are no containers to build, and no Docker registries to manage.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase