AWS CodeCommit vs SourceTree

Overview

SourceTree

Stacks10.6K

Followers8.1K

Votes727

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks324

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeCommit and SourceTree

1. Code Repository Hosting:

AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that hosts Git repositories, allowing teams to collaborate on code securely. It provides features like access control, branch permissions, and pull request management. On the other hand, SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) client for Git that facilitates working with Git repositories. While CodeCommit is a cloud-based hosting service, SourceTree acts as a standalone client for interacting with remote repositories.

2. Cloud vs. Local:

CodeCommit is a cloud-based service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), meaning the repositories are hosted on AWS infrastructure. This allows for easy scalability, accessibility, and integration with other AWS services. SourceTree, on the other hand, is a local client that runs on your computer. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing local and remote Git repositories.

3. Platform Compatibility:

CodeCommit is designed to work seamlessly with various development platforms and tools. It supports Git, making it compatible with any Git client that follows the Git protocol. SourceTree, as a client, is compatible with both Windows and macOS operating systems. It provides a consistent workflow across different platforms, allowing developers to choose their preferred development environment.

4. Collaboration Features:

CodeCommit enables collaboration through features like pull requests, branch permissions, and code reviews. It provides a centralized platform for managing code changes and ensures that the team members can work together effectively. In contrast, SourceTree focuses more on providing an intuitive interface for performing Git operations locally. It may still support collaboration to some extent but does not offer the same level of centralized features as CodeCommit.

5. Integration with AWS Services:

Being an AWS service, CodeCommit integrates well with other AWS services like AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeDeploy. This integration allows for seamless development, testing, and deployment workflows using the AWS ecosystem. SourceTree, being a stand-alone client, does not have the same level of integration with AWS services. It primarily focuses on providing Git-related functionalities rather than directly integrating with other services.

6. Pricing Model:

CodeCommit follows AWS's pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you pay based on the number of active users, storage usage, and data transfer. It offers a free tier for limited usage, making it cost-effective for small teams or individual developers. SourceTree, on the other hand, is a free Git client that does not have any additional costs associated with it. It can be used by anyone without incurring any expenses related to the tool itself.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit is a cloud-based source control service provided by AWS, offering features like access control, collaboration, and seamless integration with other AWS services. SourceTree, on the other hand, is a user-friendly Git client that runs locally, providing an intuitive interface for managing Git repositories. While CodeCommit focuses on hosting repositories and facilitating collaboration, SourceTree focuses on ease of use and local Git operations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SourceTree, AWS CodeCommit

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SourceTree	AWS CodeCommit
Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks 10.6K	Stacks 324
Followers 8.1K	Followers 826
Votes 727	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 205 Visual history and branch view 164 Beautiful UI 134 Easy repository browsing 87 Gitflow support 75 Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines Cons 12 Crashes often 8 So many bugs 7 Fetching is slow sometimes 5 No dark theme (Windows) 5 Extremely slow	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 NO LFS support 2 No webhooks
Integrations
GitHub Git Bitbucket Windows macOS Mercurial	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to SourceTree, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeCommit vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeCommit and SourceTree

1. Code Repository Hosting:

2. Cloud vs. Local:

3. Platform Compatibility:

4. Collaboration Features:

5. Integration with AWS Services:

6. Pricing Model:

AWS CodeCommit vs SourceTree

Overview

AWS CodeCommit vs SourceTree: What are the differences?