AWS Elemental MediaConvert vs AWS Elemental MediaLive: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS Elemental MediaConvert and AWS Elemental MediaLive are two cloud-based video processing services offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). While both services are part of the AWS Elemental suite and have overlapping functionalities, there are several key differences between them.

1. Pricing and Cost Model: AWS Elemental MediaConvert follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the minutes of video processed, the output generated, and the additional features utilized. On the other hand, AWS Elemental MediaLive follows a reserved pricing model, where users commit to a fixed usage capacity for a specific duration of time. This reserved model can be more cost-effective for users with predictable and consistent workloads.

2. Encoding Versatility: AWS Elemental MediaConvert provides a wide range of encoding options and supports a variety of video codecs, audio codecs, and output formats. It allows users to customize encoding parameters according to their specific requirements. In contrast, AWS Elemental MediaLive focuses primarily on live video processing and is optimized for real-time encoding, packaging, and delivery of video streams for live events.

3. Workflow Complexity: AWS Elemental MediaConvert is designed for complex video workflow scenarios that require multi-step processing, advanced features, and custom integrations. It provides a scalable and flexible solution for on-demand video processing, enabling users to manage complex transcoding, QC, and delivery workflows. On the other hand, AWS Elemental MediaLive offers a simplified workflow for live video processing, with a focus on real-time encoding, packaging, and delivery. It is designed for users who require a reliable and scalable solution for streaming live events.

4. Input and Output Sources: AWS Elemental MediaConvert supports a wide range of input sources, including file-based inputs from Amazon S3, HTTP(S), and FTP(S) protocols, while also allowing users to ingest from live video sources. It can generate output files in various formats, including output to AWS storage services like S3. AWS Elemental MediaLive, however, is primarily designed for ingestion from live video sources, such as cameras, satellite feeds, or IP video sources, and focuses on real-time encoding and streaming of video streams.

5. Latency and Real-Time Capabilities: AWS Elemental MediaConvert is optimized for on-demand video processing, where latency can be more flexible. It provides options for adaptive bitrate streaming and video quality optimization but may introduce some delay in the processing pipeline. In contrast, AWS Elemental MediaLive is built for low-latency live video processing and streaming. It ensures minimal delay in encoding and delivery, making it suitable for applications requiring real-time video streaming.

6. Integration and Automation: AWS Elemental MediaConvert offers comprehensive APIs and SDKs, allowing users to integrate the service with their existing video workflows and automation tools. It can be seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, enabling easy access and management of other AWS services. On the other hand, AWS Elemental MediaLive also provides APIs for integration but focuses more on providing managed video processing workflows for live events, requiring less manual intervention.

In Summary, AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a versatile and scalable solution for complex on-demand video processing workflows, supporting customization and integrations. AWS Elemental MediaLive, on the other hand, is specialized for real-time live video processing and streaming, with a focus on low latency and ease of use.