StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Firecracker vs Cloudflare Workers

AWS Firecracker vs Cloudflare Workers

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Firecracker
AWS Firecracker
Stacks6
Followers34
Votes0
GitHub Stars31.0K
Forks2.1K
Cloudflare Workers
Cloudflare Workers
Stacks171
Followers116
Votes0

AWS Firecracker vs Cloudflare Workers: What are the differences?

Key differences between AWS Firecracker and Cloudflare Workers

1. Cloudflare Workers Deployment: Cloudflare Workers allow developers to deploy their code at the edge, placing it closer to the end-users and reducing latency. This enables faster response times and improved user experience. On the other hand, AWS Firecracker provides lightweight virtualization that enables the creation of microVMs, giving developers more control over their infrastructure and allowing them to run multiple instances in isolation.

2. Architecture: AWS Firecracker utilizes a paravirtualization approach, which allows for efficient resource utilization and provides better security and isolation between instances. In contrast, Cloudflare Workers operate on a serverless architecture, running code on the company's global network of edge servers, which offers scalability and fault tolerance benefits.

3. Programming Language Support: Cloudflare Workers support JavaScript, allowing developers to write their code in a language they are familiar with. AWS Firecracker, on the other hand, supports multiple programming languages such as Rust, C, and C++, providing developers with more flexibility and allowing them to leverage their existing skills and libraries.

4. Ease of Use: Cloudflare Workers provide a simple and intuitive interface for deploying code at the edge, requiring minimal configuration and setup. AWS Firecracker, on the other hand, requires more expertise to set up and manage, as it is designed for advanced users who require fine-grained control over their virtualized environments.

5. Pricing Model: Cloudflare Workers pricing is based on the number of requests processed and compute time, allowing developers to pay only for the resources they use. AWS Firecracker, being a part of the wider AWS ecosystem, follows the pricing model of the underlying infrastructure, which can include additional costs for storage, network traffic, and other services utilized.

6. Community and Ecosystem: Cloudflare Workers benefit from a large and active community of developers, providing access to resources, tutorials, and community-built tools. AWS Firecracker, being a part of the AWS ecosystem, has a vast range of services and integrations available, allowing developers to leverage the extensive capabilities of the platform.

In summary, Cloudflare Workers provide a serverless architecture for deploying code at the edge, supporting JavaScript and offering simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, AWS Firecracker offers lightweight virtualization with more control, support for multiple programming languages, and a wide range of services within the AWS ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Firecracker
AWS Firecracker
Cloudflare Workers
Cloudflare Workers

Firecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services that provide serverless operational models. Firecracker runs workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs, which combine the security and isolation properties provided by hardware virtualization technology with the speed and flexibility of containers.

Build serverless applications on Cloudflare's global cloud network of 165 data centers. It provides a lightweight JavaScript execution environment that allows developers to augment existing applications or create entirely new ones without configuring or maintaining infrastructure.

-
Load balance between multiple origins to improve speed or reliability; Render HTML templates while fetching dynamic content from your origin; Dynamically respond to requests without needing to connect to an origin server at all; Generate parallel requests to different services and combine the responses; Create custom security rules and filters to block unwanted visitors and bots; Perform data sanitization and validation before sending a request to your origin; Use custom logic to decide which requests are cacheable and improve cache hit rate; Deploy fast fixes to your site in seconds without having to update your origin server
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
6
Stacks
171
Followers
34
Followers
116
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Lerna
Lerna
Rust
Rust
C++
C++
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to AWS Firecracker, Cloudflare Workers?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase