StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Firecracker vs Laravel Vapor

AWS Firecracker vs Laravel Vapor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Firecracker
AWS Firecracker
Stacks6
Followers34
Votes0
GitHub Stars31.0K
Forks2.1K
Laravel Vapor
Laravel Vapor
Stacks45
Followers48
Votes0

AWS Firecracker vs Laravel Vapor: What are the differences?

<AWS Firecracker and Laravel Vapor are two different services that cater to specific needs of developers. AWS Firecracker provides a lightweight, secure, and instant-on alternative for multi-tenant workloads, while Laravel Vapor is a serverless deployment platform specifically designed for Laravel applications. Here are the key differences between AWS Firecracker and Laravel Vapor.>

  1. Infrastructure Management: AWS Firecracker requires developers to manage and provision the underlying infrastructure, including networking, storage, and security configurations. In contrast, Laravel Vapor abstracts away the infrastructure management tasks, allowing developers to focus solely on building and deploying their Laravel applications without worrying about server provisioning or scaling.

  2. Cost Model: AWS Firecracker follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users pay only for the resources they consume. On the other hand, Laravel Vapor offers a fixed pricing model based on the number of requests and storage used, providing more predictability in terms of cost.

  3. Customization Options: With AWS Firecracker, developers have more flexibility in customizing the virtual machine instances to meet their specific requirements, allowing for fine-tuning of the performance and security settings. Laravel Vapor, on the other hand, offers a more opinionated approach, limiting the customization options in favor of simplicity and ease of use.

  4. Vendor Lock-in: AWS Firecracker ties users to the AWS ecosystem, making it challenging to migrate to other cloud providers in the future. In contrast, Laravel Vapor is cloud-agnostic and can be deployed on any infrastructure supported by AWS Lambda, enabling developers to switch between cloud providers without major architectural changes.

  5. Scaling Capabilities: AWS Firecracker provides more control over the scaling behavior of the virtual machines, allowing users to manually scale resources based on demand. Whereas, Laravel Vapor leverages the auto-scaling capabilities of AWS Lambda, automatically adjusting the number of resources allocated based on traffic patterns without user intervention.

  6. Integration with Framework: AWS Firecracker can be integrated with various programming languages and frameworks, providing a versatile environment for running different types of workloads. In comparison, Laravel Vapor is specifically designed to work seamlessly with Laravel applications, offering pre-configured settings and optimizations tailored for Laravel projects.

In Summary, AWS Firecracker offers more customization and control over infrastructure management, while Laravel Vapor provides a simplified and serverless deployment platform designed for Laravel applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Firecracker
AWS Firecracker
Laravel Vapor
Laravel Vapor

Firecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services that provide serverless operational models. Firecracker runs workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs, which combine the security and isolation properties provided by hardware virtualization technology with the speed and flexibility of containers.

It is an auto-scaling, serverless deployment platform for Laravel, powered by AWS Lambda. Manage your Laravel infrastructure on Vapor and fall in love with the scalability and simplicity of serverless.

-
Auto-scaling web / queue infrastructure fine tuned for Laravel; Zero-downtime deployments and rollbacks; Environment variable / secret management; Database management, including point-in-time restores and scaling; Redis Cache management, including cluster scaling; Database and cache tunnels, allowing for easy local inspection; Automatic uploading of assets to Cloudfront CDN during deployment; Unique, Vapor assigned vanity URLs for each environment, allowing immediate inspection; Custom application domains; DNS management; Certificate management and renewal; Application, database, and cache metrics; CI friendly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
6
Stacks
45
Followers
34
Followers
48
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to AWS Firecracker, Laravel Vapor?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase