.NET vs Axon

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.4K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Axon

Stacks67

Followers89

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.5K

Forks822

.NET vs Axon: What are the differences?

Introduction

Microsoft .NET and Axon are both popular software development frameworks used for creating and running applications. This article aims to provide a comparison between the two, highlighting key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. .NET Framework: Object-Oriented vs. Axon Framework: Event-Driven

The .NET framework is based on an object-oriented programming (OOP) model, where software is developed by creating classes and objects. On the other hand, the Axon framework follows an event-driven approach, where software components communicate through dispatching and handling events. This fundamental architectural difference affects the way applications are designed and implemented, with each framework offering unique benefits and trade-offs in terms of scalability, flexibility, and maintainability.

2. .NET Framework: Multi-Language vs. Axon Framework: Java-Focused

The .NET framework supports multiple programming languages such as C#, VB.NET, and F#, allowing developers to choose their preferred language. In contrast, the Axon framework is primarily focused on Java, which means that it provides specific features and integrations tailored to the Java ecosystem. This language restriction may be a determining factor for organizations that already have a preferred programming language in their tech stack.

3. .NET Framework: Integrated Development Environment (IDE) vs. Axon Framework: Command-Line Interface (CLI)

Developing applications with the .NET framework often involves using an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Visual Studio, which offers a rich set of tools and features for code editing, debugging, and project management. In comparison, the Axon framework is primarily driven through a command-line interface (CLI), which relies more on manual configuration and setup. This difference in development environment may appeal to developers who prefer a specific toolset or workflow.

4. .NET Framework: Windows-Centric vs. Axon Framework: Platform-Independent

The .NET framework, originally designed by Microsoft, has traditionally been more focused on supporting Windows-based applications. This aligns with Microsoft's ecosystem and tooling. However, the Axon framework is designed to be platform-independent, allowing applications to be developed and deployed across different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and a wide range of Linux distributions. This cross-platform compatibility can be a crucial factor for organizations that require their applications to run on diverse environments.

5. .NET Framework: Extensive Libraries and Frameworks vs. Axon Framework: Lightweight and Specialized

The .NET framework provides an extensive set of libraries and frameworks, such as Entity Framework for data access, ASP.NET for web development, and Windows Forms for desktop applications. These libraries serve a wide range of purposes, making it easier for developers to accomplish various tasks. Conversely, the Axon framework takes a more lightweight and specialized approach, focusing on providing a dedicated set of features and tooling specifically for building event-driven architectures. This targeted approach can be advantageous if an organization requires precisely tailored functionality for their event-driven applications.

6. .NET Framework: Mature and Established vs. Axon Framework: Growing and Evolving

The .NET framework has a long history and is widely adopted across industries, making it a mature and established technology ecosystem. This maturity brings benefits such as extensive community support, a wide range of third-party libraries and tools, and robust documentation. On the other hand, the Axon framework is relatively young and still evolving. While it may not have the same level of maturity and widespread adoption as .NET, it offers a fresh and innovative approach to building event-driven systems, with active development and a passionate community. Organizations may need to consider their preference for stability and comprehensiveness versus cutting-edge approaches when choosing between the two frameworks.

In summary, the key differences between .NET and Axon can be summarized as follows: .NET is object-oriented, supports multiple languages, has an integrated development environment, is primarily Windows-centric, provides extensive libraries and frameworks, and is a mature technology ecosystem. Meanwhile, Axon is event-driven, focused on Java, driven through a command-line interface, platform-independent, lightweight and specialized, and a growing and evolving framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, Axon

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	Axon
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	Based on architectural principles, such as DDD and CQRS, Axon Framework provides the building blocks to create scalable and extensible applications while maintaining consistency in distributed systems.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	Scalability and Performance; Auditability and Transparency; Business Agility; Application and Business Insights
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars 3.5K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 822
Stacks 15.4K	Stacks 67
Followers 5.9K	Followers 89
Votes 1.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft dependable systems 8 Microsoft itself 5 Hard learning curve	No community feedback yet
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	MongoDB Kafka Spring Boot Java Spring Framework gRPC Kotlin Spring Cloud Project Reactor

What are some alternatives to .NET, Axon?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase