StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Azure Security Center vs Blue Coat

Azure Security Center vs Blue Coat

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Security Center
Azure Security Center
Stacks22
Followers45
Votes0
Blue Coat
Blue Coat
Stacks2
Followers12
Votes0

Azure Security Center vs Blue Coat: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this article, we will compare the key differences between Azure Security Center and Blue Coat. These two solutions offer different approaches to security, with Azure Security Center focusing on cloud security, and Blue Coat providing web security solutions. Let's explore their differences in more detail.

  1. Architecture Approach: Azure Security Center is a cloud-based security posture management solution that provides visibility and control over the security of resources in Azure. It leverages a combination of log analytics, machine learning, and threat intelligence to identify and remediate security issues. On the other hand, Blue Coat is a web security solution that offers various security features for protection against web-based threats, including web filtering, malware detection, and SSL visibility.

  2. Scope of Coverage: Azure Security Center primarily focuses on securing Azure resources and workloads, including virtual machines, containers, and serverless applications. It provides a centralized view of security recommendations, compliance assessments, and threat alerts specific to Azure. In contrast, Blue Coat offers web security solutions that are designed to protect users accessing the web by filtering and inspecting web traffic, regardless of the infrastructure or platform used.

  3. Integration Flexibility: Azure Security Center integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Monitor and Azure Sentinel, allowing for centralized security management and threat detection and response. It also provides APIs for integration with third-party security tools and services. Blue Coat, on the other hand, can be integrated with existing network infrastructure and proxy servers to extend web security capabilities without significant changes to the network architecture.

  4. Threat Detection Capabilities: Azure Security Center utilizes advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms to detect and alert on potential security incidents and threats within Azure resources. It can detect various types of attacks, including brute force attacks, suspicious user activities, and vulnerabilities within virtual machines. Blue Coat, on the other hand, focuses on web-based threats and provides features like malware detection, web filtering, and URL categorization to protect against malicious web content and attacks.

  5. Compliance Monitoring: Azure Security Center offers built-in compliance assessments based on industry standards and regulations, such as CIS benchmarks and GDPR. It provides recommendations and remediation steps to address compliance issues within Azure resources. Blue Coat, on the other hand, offers web security features that can help organizations comply with web-related regulations and policies, such as filtering objectionable content, enforcing web usage policies, and monitoring user activities.

  6. Deployment Flexibility: Azure Security Center is a cloud-native solution that is tightly integrated with Azure services and can be easily deployed and managed within the Azure portal. It offers both free and paid tiers, depending on the level of security features required. Blue Coat, on the other hand, can be deployed on-premises as a physical or virtual appliance, or it can be deployed as a cloud service. This provides flexibility for organizations to choose the deployment model that best suits their requirements.

In Summary, Azure Security Center focuses on cloud security and offers advanced threat detection capabilities, while Blue Coat provides web security solutions with features like web filtering and malware detection. These solutions differ in terms of architecture approach, scope of coverage, integration flexibility, threat detection capabilities, compliance monitoring, and deployment flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Security Center
Azure Security Center
Blue Coat
Blue Coat

It is a unified infrastructure security management system that strengthens the security posture of your data centers, and provides advanced threat protection across your hybrid workloads in the cloud - whether they're in Azure or not - as well as on premises.

Acquired by Symantec. It is the global leader in cyber security. Operating one of the world’s largest cyber intelligence networks, we see more threats, and protect more customers from the next generation of attacks.

Turn on protection you need; Security posture management for your cloud workloads; Get enhanced threat protection with Security Center Standard tier
-
Statistics
Stacks
22
Stacks
2
Followers
45
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Azure Security Center, Blue Coat?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope