StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Azure Service Fabric vs Istio

Azure Service Fabric vs Istio

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Stacks103
Followers284
Votes26
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks399
Istio
Istio
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.5K
Votes54
GitHub Stars37.6K
Forks8.1K

Azure Service Fabric vs Istio: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Service Fabric and Istio are two popular technologies that are widely used in the software development industry. While both of these technologies are used for managing and deploying applications, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Deployment platform: Azure Service Fabric is a platform for building and managing scalable and reliable services. It provides the infrastructure and tools needed to package, deploy, and manage microservices and containerized applications. On the other hand, Istio is an open-source service mesh platform that enables developers to connect, secure, and manage microservices within a distributed application. It provides features like traffic management, security, observability, and policy enforcement.

  2. Focus on cloud-native application development: Azure Service Fabric is designed specifically for building cloud-native applications. It provides native integration with Azure services like Azure IoT Hub, Azure Functions, and Azure Event Hubs, making it easier to develop applications that leverage these services. Istio, on the other hand, is agnostic to the underlying cloud platform and can be used with any Kubernetes-based environment. It is not tied to any specific cloud provider and can be used with both on-premises and cloud deployments.

  3. Service discovery and routing capabilities: Azure Service Fabric has built-in service discovery and routing capabilities. It automatically registers and discovers services within a cluster, making it easier to connect and communicate between services. Istio, on the other hand, provides advanced traffic management capabilities, including intelligent routing, load balancing, circuit breaking, and retrying. It allows developers to define rules for routing traffic between services based on criteria like HTTP headers, cookies, and source IP addresses.

  4. Security and policy enforcement: Azure Service Fabric provides built-in security features like integrated Windows authentication, role-based access control (RBAC), and transport layer security (TLS) encryption. It also supports custom security extensions for implementing additional security measures. Istio, on the other hand, provides advanced security features like mutual TLS authentication, authorization policies, and encryption of traffic between services. It enables fine-grained control over access to services and allows policies to be defined at the service level.

  5. Observability and monitoring: Azure Service Fabric provides built-in monitoring capabilities, including metrics, logging, and tracing. It integrates with Azure Monitor to provide insights into application performance and health. Istio, on the other hand, provides advanced observability features like distributed tracing, metrics collection, and logging. It integrates with tools like Jaeger and Prometheus to provide detailed insights into the behavior and performance of services within a mesh.

  6. Community and ecosystem: Azure Service Fabric has a strong community and ecosystem of tools and libraries that are specifically built for the platform. Microsoft provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and support for developers using Azure Service Fabric. Istio, on the other hand, has a vibrant open-source community and is backed by companies like Google, IBM, and Red Hat. It has a wide range of integration with popular tools and platforms and benefits from the contributions of a large community of developers.

In Summary, Azure Service Fabric is a platform for building and managing cloud-native applications with built-in service discovery, routing, security, and monitoring capabilities. Istio, on the other hand, is an open-source service mesh platform that provides advanced traffic management, security, and observability features for microservices within a distributed application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Azure Service Fabric, Istio

Prateek
Prateek

Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k
Comments
lyc218
lyc218

Feb 21, 2020

Needs advice

Envoy proxy is widely adopted in many companies for service mesh proxy, but it utilizes BoringSSL by default. Red Hat OpenShift fork envoy branch with their own OpenSSL support, I wonder any other companies are also using envoy-openssl branch for compatibility? How about AWS App Mesh?

Any input would be much appreciated!

42.8k views42.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Istio
Istio

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Simplify microservices development and application lifecycle management; Reliably scale and orchestrate containers and microservices; Data-aware platform for low-latency, high-throughput workloads with stateful containers or microservices; Run anything – your choice of languages and programming models; Run anywhere – supports Windows/Linux in Azure, on-premises, or other clouds; Scales up to thousands of machines
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Stars
37.6K
GitHub Forks
399
GitHub Forks
8.1K
Stacks
103
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
284
Followers
1.5K
Votes
26
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Intelligent, fast, reliable
  • 4
    Runs most of Azure core services
  • 3
    Reliability
  • 3
    Superior programming models
  • 3
    More reliable than Kubernetes
Pros
  • 14
    Zero code for logging and monitoring
  • 9
    Service Mesh
  • 8
    Great flexibility
  • 5
    Resiliency
  • 5
    Powerful authorization mechanisms
Cons
  • 17
    Performance
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Azure Service Fabric, Istio?

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Claudia

Claudia

Claudia helps you deploy Node.js microservices to Amazon Web Services easily. It automates and simplifies deployment workflows and error prone tasks, so you can focus on important problems and not have to worry about AWS service quirks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana