StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Azure Storage vs DigitalOcean Spaces

Azure Storage vs DigitalOcean Spaces

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.1K
Followers787
Votes52
DigitalOcean Spaces
DigitalOcean Spaces
Stacks85
Followers99
Votes5

Azure Storage vs DigitalOcean Spaces: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Azure Storage and DigitalOcean Spaces for cloud storage solutions.

  1. Storage Options: Azure Storage offers various types of storage options such as Blob storage, File storage, Queue storage, and Table storage. On the other hand, DigitalOcean Spaces only provides object storage, which is suitable for handling large amounts of unstructured data.

  2. Pricing Model: Azure Storage has a complex pricing model with a pay-as-you-go system and multiple tiers. DigitalOcean Spaces, in contrast, offers a simple flat pricing structure based on usage, which can be more cost-effective for smaller businesses or projects.

  3. Data Center Locations: Azure Storage has a vast global network of data centers located in multiple regions around the world, providing high availability and low latency. DigitalOcean Spaces, however, has limited data center locations compared to Azure, which may impact performance for users in certain geographical areas.

  4. Integration and Ecosystem: Azure Storage is deeply integrated with other Microsoft Azure services, providing a seamless experience for users of the Azure platform. DigitalOcean Spaces has integrations with some third-party tools and platforms but may not offer the same level of ecosystem support as Azure.

  5. Security Features: Azure Storage offers advanced security features such as encryption at rest, Azure Active Directory integration, and role-based access control. DigitalOcean Spaces provides basic security measures like SSL encryption and access control but may lack some of the more sophisticated security options available in Azure.

In Summary, Azure Storage offers a more diverse range of storage options, complex pricing model, and broader global reach compared to DigitalOcean Spaces, which is more cost-effective, simpler in terms of pricing, and may suit smaller projects or businesses.

Advice on Azure Storage, DigitalOcean Spaces

Mohammad
Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceonBackblaze B2 Cloud StorageBackblaze B2 Cloud StoragePHPPHPLaravelLaravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

  • Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?

  • DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure

  • Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.

  • Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.

  • There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
DigitalOcean Spaces
DigitalOcean Spaces

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
Create Spaces in an instant;Scalable storage;Available as a standalone service; Simple drag-and-drop UI;Programmatically control and migrate your data;Backups;Logs;Archives
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
85
Followers
787
Followers
99
Votes
52
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cost-effective
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
Pros
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Cheap
Integrations
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean

What are some alternatives to Azure Storage, DigitalOcean Spaces?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase