StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Azure Synapse vs Mule

Azure Synapse vs Mule

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mule runtime engine
Mule runtime engine
Stacks127
Followers129
Votes8
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

Azure Synapse vs Mule: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Synapse and Mule are two widely used technologies in the field of data integration and analytics. While they both serve the purpose of enabling organizations to process and analyze large volumes of data, they have significant differences in terms of architecture, functionality, and use cases. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Azure Synapse and Mule, providing a clear understanding of their strengths and capabilities.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: Azure Synapse is a cloud-based analytics service provided by Microsoft, designed for big data processing and analysis. It integrates the capabilities of enterprise data warehousing, big data, and data integration into a single platform. On the other hand, Mule is an integration platform offered by MuleSoft, which focuses on integrating various applications, systems, and services for seamless data flow and communication.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Azure Synapse is built on the foundation of massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture, providing high scalability and performance for processing large datasets. It can handle both structured and unstructured data, allowing organizations to analyze diverse data sources efficiently. Mule, on the other hand, offers scalability through the use of lightweight containers, allowing applications and integrations to scale based on demand. While it can handle large volumes of data, its core focus is on integration rather than big data analytics.

  3. Data Integration Capabilities: Azure Synapse provides robust data integration capabilities through its built-in data integration services and connectors. It allows organizations to ingest data from various sources, transform and prepare it for analysis, and load it into the data warehouse or data lake for further processing. Mule, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of integration features, including connectors, transformations, and workflow management, enabling organizations to connect and integrate different systems, applications, and services.

  4. Analytics and Business Intelligence: Azure Synapse offers a wide range of analytics tools and technologies, including SQL-based querying, machine learning, and Power BI integration. It provides a unified and integrated environment for data preparation, exploration, and visualization. Mule, on the other hand, focuses primarily on data integration and does not provide built-in analytics capabilities. However, it can integrate with various analytics and business intelligence tools to enable data-driven decision-making.

  5. Deployment and Management: Azure Synapse is a fully managed service offered by Microsoft, which means organizations do not have to worry about infrastructure provisioning, configuration, and management. It provides a scalable and secure environment for data processing and analytics. Mule, on the other hand, offers flexibility in terms of deployment options. Organizations can deploy Mule integration applications on-premises or in the cloud, depending on their specific requirements. However, it requires additional effort and expertise for infrastructure setup and management.

  6. Pricing and Cost: Azure Synapse pricing is based on usage, including factors such as storage, compute, and data transfer. It offers different pricing tiers to cater to different usage scenarios and requirements. Mule pricing, on the other hand, is based on the number of cores and instances required for deployment. It offers different licensing options, including perpetual and subscription-based models. The cost of Mule deployment depends on factors such as the number of applications and integrations, the complexity of the integration flows, and the desired performance levels.

**In Summary, Azure Synapse is a fully managed analytics service designed for big data processing and analysis, offering scalable architecture, robust data integration capabilities, built-in analytics tools, and simplified deployment and management. Mule, on the other hand, is an integration platform focusing on seamless data flow and communication between various systems, providing scalability, comprehensive integration features, flexibility in deployment, and integration with analytics and business intelligence tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mule runtime engine
Mule runtime engine
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

Its mission is to connect the world’s applications, data and devices. It makes connecting anything easy with Anypoint Platform™, the only complete integration platform for SaaS, SOA and APIs. Thousands of organizations in 60 countries, from emerging brands to Global 500 enterprises, use it to innovate faster and gain competitive advantage.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Connects data;Connects applications;Integration platform;Fast
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
Stacks
127
Stacks
104
Followers
129
Followers
230
Votes
8
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 2
    Microservices
  • 2
    Integration
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
  • 1
    Concurrency
Integrations
CloudApp
CloudApp
API Umbrella
API Umbrella
Zapier
Zapier
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Mule runtime engine, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase