StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Azure Synapse vs Snowflake

Azure Synapse vs Snowflake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Snowflake
Snowflake
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes27
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

Azure Synapse vs Snowflake: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of cloud data platforms, Azure Synapse and Snowflake are two leading solutions that offer data warehousing and analytics capabilities. Understanding the key differences between these platforms can help organizations make informed decisions when selecting the right tool for their data needs.

  1. Architecture: Azure Synapse leverages the Apache Spark engine for data processing and analytics, allowing users to create data pipelines and run complex queries efficiently. On the other hand, Snowflake utilizes a multi-cluster, shared data architecture that separates storage and compute, providing flexibility in scaling resources based on workloads.

  2. Integration: Azure Synapse seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft Azure services such as Azure Machine Learning and Power BI, offering a comprehensive ecosystem for end-to-end data processing and analytics. In contrast, Snowflake provides integration with various third-party tools and services, enabling users to leverage a wider range of applications within the data ecosystem.

  3. Security: Azure Synapse offers robust security features such as Azure Active Directory integration, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), and dynamic data masking to protect sensitive data and ensure compliance with security standards. Snowflake also prioritizes security with features like end-to-end encryption, immutable audit logs, and data governance capabilities to safeguard data across the platform.

  4. Cost Management: Azure Synapse provides pricing models based on compute resources and storage consumption, allowing users to optimize costs based on their usage patterns. Snowflake offers a usage-based pricing model with separate charges for compute and storage, enabling organizations to scale resources efficiently and manage costs effectively.

  5. Performance: Azure Synapse enables users to leverage in-memory processing and distributed computing capabilities for high-performance data processing and analytics. Snowflake's unique architecture ensures optimized query performance through intelligent query optimization and workload management, delivering consistent performance for varying workloads and query complexity.

  6. Scalability: Both Azure Synapse and Snowflake offer scalable solutions for data processing and analytics, allowing users to easily scale resources up or down based on workload demands. However, Snowflake's shared data architecture provides seamless and automatic scaling of compute resources without impacting data availability or performance, offering enhanced scalability for growing data needs.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Azure Synapse and Snowflake in terms of architecture, integration, security, cost management, performance, and scalability can help organizations make informed decisions when selecting a cloud data platform for their data warehousing and analytics needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Snowflake
Snowflake
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

-
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
104
Followers
1.2K
Followers
230
Votes
27
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Public and Private Data Sharing
  • 4
    User Friendly
  • 4
    Good Performance
  • 4
    Multicloud
  • 3
    Great Documentation
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
  • 1
    Concurrency
Integrations
Python
Python
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Node.js
Node.js
Looker
Looker
Periscope
Periscope
Mode
Mode
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Snowflake, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase