StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage vs Rook

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage vs Rook

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Stacks58
Followers34
Votes1
Rook
Rook
Stacks54
Followers103
Votes4
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks2.8K

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage vs Rook: What are the differences?

**Introduction**

1. **Storage Model**: Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage is a cloud storage solution that provides pay-as-you-go pricing for data storage, while Rook is a cloud-native storage orchestrator that uses storage providers like Ceph, NFS, and more.
2. **Data Redundancy**: Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage offers 11x9s data durability, ensuring data longevity and availability, whereas Rook provides data redundancy by replicating data across multiple storage providers for fault tolerance.
3. **Scalability**: Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage scales easily with the ability to store petabytes of data, while Rook scales by adding more nodes to the Kubernetes cluster, allowing for horizontal scaling.
4. **Data Accessibility**: Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage provides a simple RESTful API for easy access to data, whereas Rook abstracts the complexities of underlying storage systems providing seamless access to data within Kubernetes.
5. **Integration**: Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage integrates with various third-party tools and services, making it versatile for different use cases, while Rook seamlessly integrates with Kubernetes environments, simplifying storage management for containerized applications.
6. **Cost Management**: Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage offers transparent pricing with no hidden fees, making it cost-effective for businesses, while Rook optimizes storage costs by utilizing commodity hardware and open-source storage providers within Kubernetes.

In Summary, Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage and Rook differ in storage model, data redundancy, scalability, data accessibility, integration, and cost management, providing unique features and capabilities for cloud storage solutions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage, Rook

Ben
Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Rook
Rook

It is a generic cloud storage. You can use it from any computer, any operating system or any cloud storage purpose. You can manage and store large amounts of media files using this service

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

-
Simple and reliable automated resource management; Hyper-scale or hyper-converge your storage clusters; Efficiently distribute and replicate data to minimize loss; Provision, file, block, and object with multiple storage providers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
58
Stacks
54
Followers
34
Followers
103
Votes
1
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great API
Pros
  • 3
    Minio Integration
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 2
    Ceph is difficult
  • 1
    Slow
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Cassandra
Cassandra
CockroachDB
CockroachDB

What are some alternatives to Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage, Rook?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase