Behat vs SpecFlow

Overview

Behat

Stacks179

Followers65

Votes2

GitHub Stars3.7K

Forks582

SpecFlow

Stacks153

Followers105

Votes0

Behat vs SpecFlow: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Behat and SpecFlow are both popular tools used for Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) in software testing. They allow testers to write executable specifications in natural language, making it easier to collaborate with stakeholders and translate business requirements into test scenarios.

Programming Language: Behat is primarily used with PHP, while SpecFlow is designed for the .NET framework using C#. This means that teams already using PHP or .NET may lean towards one tool over the other based on their existing technology stack.
Syntax and DSL: Behat uses Gherkin syntax, which is a structured language that uses keywords like Given, When, and Then to define test scenarios. SpecFlow also utilizes Gherkin, but with slight syntax differences that are specific to C#. Testers may prefer one syntax over the other based on familiarity or ease of use.
Community and Ecosystem: Behat has a strong community in the PHP world, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available to enhance its functionality. SpecFlow, on the other hand, benefits from the extensive .NET ecosystem and support, offering integrations with various tools commonly used in .NET development.
IDE Integration: Behat is often integrated with IDEs like PhpStorm for better code editing and debugging capabilities. SpecFlow, being .NET-specific, has tighter integrations with Visual Studio, providing a seamless development experience for .NET developers.
Test Execution: Behat relies on frameworks like Mink for web application testing, enabling testers to interact with web pages and simulate user actions. SpecFlow, with its bindings to Selenium, allows for more robust and extensive web UI testing capabilities out of the box.
Cross-platform Compatibility: Behat, being built for PHP, can be run on different platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux. SpecFlow, on the other hand, while being a part of the .NET ecosystem, is limited to Windows for development and may require workarounds for other platforms.

In Summary, Behat and SpecFlow differ in programming language support, syntax, community resources, IDE integration, test execution capabilities, and cross-platform compatibility. Teams should evaluate these factors to choose the tool that best aligns with their technology stack and testing requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Behat	SpecFlow
It is an open source Behavior-Driven Development framework for PHP. It is a tool to support you in delivering software that matters through continuous communication, deliberate discovery and test-automation.	It is used to define, manage and automatically execute human-readable acceptance tests in .NET projects. Writing easily understandable tests is a cornerstone of the BDD paradigm and also helps build up a living documentation of your system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 582	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 179	Stacks 153
Followers 65	Followers 105
Votes 2	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Easy Ubiquitous language integration reusing code 1 BDD Acceptance Testing	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Behat, SpecFlow?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

Behat vs SpecFlow: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Programming Language: Behat is primarily used with PHP, while SpecFlow is designed for the .NET framework using C#. This means that teams already using PHP or .NET may lean towards one tool over the other based on their existing technology stack.
Syntax and DSL: Behat uses Gherkin syntax, which is a structured language that uses keywords like Given, When, and Then to define test scenarios. SpecFlow also utilizes Gherkin, but with slight syntax differences that are specific to C#. Testers may prefer one syntax over the other based on familiarity or ease of use.
Community and Ecosystem: Behat has a strong community in the PHP world, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available to enhance its functionality. SpecFlow, on the other hand, benefits from the extensive .NET ecosystem and support, offering integrations with various tools commonly used in .NET development.
IDE Integration: Behat is often integrated with IDEs like PhpStorm for better code editing and debugging capabilities. SpecFlow, being .NET-specific, has tighter integrations with Visual Studio, providing a seamless development experience for .NET developers.
Test Execution: Behat relies on frameworks like Mink for web application testing, enabling testers to interact with web pages and simulate user actions. SpecFlow, with its bindings to Selenium, allows for more robust and extensive web UI testing capabilities out of the box.
Cross-platform Compatibility: Behat, being built for PHP, can be run on different platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux. SpecFlow, on the other hand, while being a part of the .NET ecosystem, is limited to Windows for development and may require workarounds for other platforms.

Behat vs SpecFlow

Overview