BEM vs Material Design

Overview

Material Design

Stacks594

Followers890

Votes14

BEM

Stacks118

Followers98

Votes0

BEM vs Material Design: What are the differences?

Syntax: BEM (Block Element Modifier) utilizes a naming convention where classes are named with a prefix to indicate the block or element they belong to, followed by the modifier to denote the variations. In contrast, Material Design focuses on predefined classes that describe the intended styling and behavior of UI components without the need for extensive class naming conventions.
Modularity: BEM promotes encapsulation by emphasizing that each block or element should be self-contained and reusable, making it easier to maintain and scale in large projects. On the other hand, Material Design components are designed to work together seamlessly within the framework, facilitating consistent design across different sections of a website.
Customization: BEM allows for extensive customization through modifiers, enabling developers to create unique styles for each block or element. Material Design provides pre-designed components with limited customization options, ensuring a cohesive visual language across different websites and applications.
Documentation: BEM encourages detailed documentation of each block, element, and modifier in the codebase to enhance clarity and facilitate collaboration among team members. Material Design offers comprehensive guidelines and resources for implementing its components, reducing the need for extensive documentation within the project.
Community Support: BEM has a dedicated community that actively contributes to the improvement and evolution of the methodology, providing resources and tools for developers to implement BEM effectively. Material Design, developed by Google, benefits from the backing of a tech giant, which constantly updates and refines the design system based on industry trends and user feedback.
Adoption: BEM is widely adopted by frontend developers for its structured approach to naming conventions and modularity, making it popular in various web development projects. Material Design, being a product of Google, has gained popularity in the design community for its clean and intuitive interface, especially among Android app developers.

In Summary, BEM and Material Design differ in syntax, modularity, customization, documentation, community support, and adoption within the web development community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design	BEM
Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.	This methodology was developed at Yandex with the goals in mind that Fast development and long-lasting results for standard projects,A project involves many people,Scalable teams,Code reuse.
Statistics
Stacks 594	Stacks 118
Followers 890	Followers 98
Votes 14	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 They really set a new bar in design 4 An intuitive design 3 Simply, And Beautiful 2 Many great libraries 0 Composants Cons 2 Sometimes, it can hang the browser	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Material Design, BEM?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

BEM vs Material Design: What are the differences?

Syntax: BEM (Block Element Modifier) utilizes a naming convention where classes are named with a prefix to indicate the block or element they belong to, followed by the modifier to denote the variations. In contrast, Material Design focuses on predefined classes that describe the intended styling and behavior of UI components without the need for extensive class naming conventions.
Modularity: BEM promotes encapsulation by emphasizing that each block or element should be self-contained and reusable, making it easier to maintain and scale in large projects. On the other hand, Material Design components are designed to work together seamlessly within the framework, facilitating consistent design across different sections of a website.
Customization: BEM allows for extensive customization through modifiers, enabling developers to create unique styles for each block or element. Material Design provides pre-designed components with limited customization options, ensuring a cohesive visual language across different websites and applications.
Documentation: BEM encourages detailed documentation of each block, element, and modifier in the codebase to enhance clarity and facilitate collaboration among team members. Material Design offers comprehensive guidelines and resources for implementing its components, reducing the need for extensive documentation within the project.
Community Support: BEM has a dedicated community that actively contributes to the improvement and evolution of the methodology, providing resources and tools for developers to implement BEM effectively. Material Design, developed by Google, benefits from the backing of a tech giant, which constantly updates and refines the design system based on industry trends and user feedback.
Adoption: BEM is widely adopted by frontend developers for its structured approach to naming conventions and modularity, making it popular in various web development projects. Material Design, being a product of Google, has gained popularity in the design community for its clean and intuitive interface, especially among Android app developers.

In Summary, BEM and Material Design differ in syntax, modularity, customization, documentation, community support, and adoption within the web development community.

BEM vs Material Design

Overview