StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. BEM vs Material Design for Angular

BEM vs Material Design for Angular

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
BEM
BEM
Stacks118
Followers98
Votes0

BEM vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Introduction:

BEM (Block, Element, Modifier) and Material Design are two popular design methodologies used in web development. Focusing on Angular specifically, there are key differences between the two approaches that developers should consider when choosing a design system for their projects.

  1. Naming Convention: BEM uses a naming convention based on blocks, elements, and modifiers, making it easier to understand the structure of the code. In contrast, Material Design for Angular follows the guidelines set by Google's Material Design system, which includes pre-defined components and styles, allowing for more consistency and familiar patterns.

  2. Customization: BEM provides a high level of customization by allowing developers to create unique styles for each block, element, or modifier. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular offers a set of pre-built components and styles that can be easily integrated without the need for extensive customization.

  3. Community Support: BEM has a strong community following and a well-established set of best practices and guidelines for implementing the methodology. In comparison, Material Design for Angular is supported by Google, providing access to official documentation, resources, and updates directly from the source.

  4. Component Composition: BEM encourages the creation of reusable components that can be combined to build complex interfaces. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, relies on pre-defined components that are designed to work together seamlessly, reducing the need for custom component composition.

  5. Design Language: BEM focuses on creating a consistent and scalable design system by organizing code into blocks, elements, and modifiers. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, follows Google's Material Design principles, emphasizing motion, depth, and material surfaces to create a tactile and engaging user experience.

  6. Integration: BEM can be integrated into any project regardless of the technology stack or framework being used, offering flexibility and compatibility with a wide range of development environments. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for Angular applications, providing a seamless integration with the framework's architecture and components.

In Summary, BEM and Material Design for Angular differ in their naming conventions, customization options, community support, component composition, design language, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
BEM
BEM

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

This methodology was developed at Yandex with the goals in mind that Fast development and long-lasting results for standard projects,A project involves many people,Scalable teams,Code reuse.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
118
Followers
9.6K
Followers
98
Votes
522
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, BEM?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase