BEM vs Material Kit

Overview

BEM

Stacks118

Followers98

Votes0

Material Kit

Stacks29

Followers88

Votes0

BEM vs Material Kit: What are the differences?

Naming Convention: BEM (Block Element Modifier) uses a specific naming convention where class names are structured as block__element--modifier, focusing on individual components, while Material Kit utilizes Material Design guidelines with class names such as mdc-button or mdc-card to maintain consistency with Material Design components.
Component Structure: BEM encourages the creation of reusable and modular components by dividing them into blocks, elements, and modifiers within the HTML structure. In contrast, Material Kit follows Material Design principles with pre-designed components that need to be used as-is without much customization options for structure.
Customization Flexibility: BEM offers greater flexibility in customizing styles and functionality of components as each element and modifier can be individually targeted and modified. On the other hand, Material Kit provides a more opinionated and consistent design system with limited customization options for a cohesive look and feel.
Community Support: BEM has a strong community with a dedicated focus on best practices and guidelines for scalable and maintainable code. Material Kit, being based on Google's Material Design, benefits from the vast resources and support provided by Google and the Material Design community.
Integration with Frameworks: BEM can be easily integrated with various front-end frameworks and libraries, allowing for seamless adoption within existing projects. Material Kit, being a part of Material Design ecosystem, is highly compatible with frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue that follow Material Design guidelines.
Learning Curve: BEM might have a steeper learning curve due to its naming conventions and architectural approach, requiring developers to adapt to a new methodology. In contrast, Material Kit provides a quicker implementation with ready-to-use components that align with Material Design standards, making it easier for developers familiar with Material Design principles.

In Summary, BEM and Material Kit differ in naming conventions, component structure, customization flexibility, community support, integration with frameworks, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

BEM	Material Kit
This methodology was developed at Yandex with the goals in mind that Fast development and long-lasting results for standard projects,A project involves many people,Scalable teams,Code reuse.	Material Kit is a Free Bootstrap UI Kit with a fresh, new design inspired by Google's material design. You asked for it, so we built it. It's a great pleasure to introduce to you the material concepts in an easy to use and beautiful set of components. Along with the restyling of the Bootstrap elements, you will find three fully-coded example pages, to help you design your next project.
Statistics
Stacks 118	Stacks 29
Followers 98	Followers 88
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to BEM, Material Kit?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

BEM vs Material Kit: What are the differences?

Naming Convention: BEM (Block Element Modifier) uses a specific naming convention where class names are structured as block__element--modifier, focusing on individual components, while Material Kit utilizes Material Design guidelines with class names such as mdc-button or mdc-card to maintain consistency with Material Design components.
Component Structure: BEM encourages the creation of reusable and modular components by dividing them into blocks, elements, and modifiers within the HTML structure. In contrast, Material Kit follows Material Design principles with pre-designed components that need to be used as-is without much customization options for structure.
Customization Flexibility: BEM offers greater flexibility in customizing styles and functionality of components as each element and modifier can be individually targeted and modified. On the other hand, Material Kit provides a more opinionated and consistent design system with limited customization options for a cohesive look and feel.
Community Support: BEM has a strong community with a dedicated focus on best practices and guidelines for scalable and maintainable code. Material Kit, being based on Google's Material Design, benefits from the vast resources and support provided by Google and the Material Design community.
Integration with Frameworks: BEM can be easily integrated with various front-end frameworks and libraries, allowing for seamless adoption within existing projects. Material Kit, being a part of Material Design ecosystem, is highly compatible with frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue that follow Material Design guidelines.
Learning Curve: BEM might have a steeper learning curve due to its naming conventions and architectural approach, requiring developers to adapt to a new methodology. In contrast, Material Kit provides a quicker implementation with ready-to-use components that align with Material Design standards, making it easier for developers familiar with Material Design principles.

In Summary, BEM and Material Kit differ in naming conventions, component structure, customization flexibility, community support, integration with frameworks, and learning curve.

BEM vs Material Kit

Overview