CodeIgniter vs Blade | What are the differences? | StackShare

Blade vs CodeIgniter

Overview

CodeIgniter

Stacks3.2K

Followers1.5K

Votes466

Blade

Stacks50

Followers83

Votes0

Blade vs CodeIgniter: What are the differences?

Developers describe Blade as "A Java Web Framework". Blade is a lightweight MVC framework. It is based on the principles of simplicity and elegance. On the other hand, CodeIgniter is detailed as "A Fully Baked PHP Framework". CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.

Blade and CodeIgniter can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Blade and CodeIgniter are both open source tools. It seems that CodeIgniter with 17.4K GitHub stars and 7.72K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Blade with 4.82K GitHub stars and 1.01K GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Advice on CodeIgniter, Blade

Ajeet

Dec 16, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, We are thinking to rebuild a website and need your suggestion on which platform to choose from NodeJs, Laravel & CodeIgnitor. Since it's an education base website and there will be multiple functionalities like the use of graphics, video, animation and off-course forms for lead generation. Please advise us which tool to use to build the website considering load-time, server security, code vulnerability, etc.

216k views216k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CodeIgniter	Blade
CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.	It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.
-	Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up
Statistics
Stacks 3.2K	Stacks 50
Followers 1.5K	Followers 83
Votes 466	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 88 Mvc 76 Easy setup 70 Open source 62 Well documented 36 Community support Cons 6 No ORM 1 No CLI	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CodeIgniter, Blade?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.