StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Blade vs Material UI

Blade vs Material UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Blade
Blade
Stacks50
Followers83
Votes0

Blade vs Material UI: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Blade and Material UI are two popular front-end technologies used for web development. While both serve the purpose of creating visually appealing user interfaces, they have key differences that set them apart.

1. **Syntax**: Blade is a template engine used with Laravel, a PHP framework, which allows developers to write dynamic views using PHP-like syntax within HTML. On the other hand, Material UI is a set of React components that follow Google's Material Design guidelines, enabling developers to create responsive and consistent UI components in React applications.

2. **Language Compatibility**: Blade is specifically tailored for PHP developers, seamlessly integrating with Laravel framework and providing a familiar PHP-like syntax for building views. Material UI, on the other hand, is designed for React developers, allowing them to leverage the power of React components to create interactive user interfaces.

3. **Component Structure**: Material UI provides a wide range of pre-built components that follow the Material Design principles, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing interfaces without much customization. Blade, on the other hand, relies on PHP logic and includes directives to create dynamic content within the views.

4. **Customization**: Material UI components are highly customizable, allowing developers to style and configure each component to fit the design requirements of their application. Blade, on the other hand, offers flexibility in integrating PHP logic directly into the views, enabling developers to create dynamic content with ease.

5. **Community Support**: Material UI has a large and active community of React developers who contribute to the library, provide support, and share resources for using Material UI effectively in React applications. Blade, being a part of Laravel, benefits from the Laravel community's support and resources, making it easier for developers to find solutions to their Blade-related queries.

6. **Learning Curve**: Blade, with its PHP-like syntax, may be easier for PHP developers to adopt, especially if they are already familiar with Laravel. Material UI, with its React component-based approach, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to React and the concept of component-based development.

## Summary
In summary, Blade and Material UI have significant differences in terms of syntax, language compatibility, component structure, customization options, community support, and learning curve, making them suitable for different types of developers and projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Blade

Xinyi
Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Blade
Blade

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
50
Followers
3.7K
Followers
83
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Blade?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase