Overview

Blade

Stacks50

Followers83

Votes0

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Blade vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Blade and Next.js

Blade and Next.js are both popular frameworks used for web development. While Blade is a templating engine developed for the Laravel PHP framework, Next.js is a React framework used for building server-side rendered and static web applications. Here are the key differences between Blade and Next.js:

1. Templating vs Framework: Blade is primarily a templating engine that allows developers to write HTML code with added functionalities like loops, conditionals, and includes. It is tightly integrated with the Laravel framework. On the other hand, Next.js is a complete framework that offers a wide range of features including server-side rendering, routing, and data fetching.

2. Language and Ecosystem: Blade uses PHP as its programming language, which has a large ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools available. Laravel, the PHP framework that Blade is a part of, provides a robust ecosystem with pre-built functionalities. Next.js, on the other hand, uses JavaScript and the React library, which has a thriving ecosystem with a wide range of npm packages available.

3. Server-side Rendering (SSR): Next.js has built-in support for server-side rendering, which means that the initial rendering of the web page happens on the server before sending it to the client's browser. This allows for better performance in terms of search engine optimization (SEO) and faster page loading. Blade, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for server-side rendering.

4. Client-side Rendering (CSR) vs Static Site Generation (SSG): With Blade, the rendering of the web page happens on the client-side, as it is part of the Laravel framework, which follows a traditional client-server architecture. Next.js, on the other hand, offers multiple rendering options including client-side rendering (CSR) and static site generation (SSG). This allows developers to choose the best rendering strategy based on their project requirements.

5. Routing and Navigation: Blade relies on the Laravel framework for handling routing and navigation within the application. Laravel provides a powerful routing system with various features like named routes, route groups, and middleware. Next.js, on the other hand, has its own routing system that allows for dynamic routing and nested routing. It also provides built-in support for client-side navigation without page reloading.

6. Deployment and Hosting: Blade applications can be deployed on any web server that supports PHP. Laravel provides tools for easy deployment and popular hosting platforms like shared hosting, VPS, or cloud hosting can be used. Next.js applications, on the other hand, can be deployed as serverless applications on platforms like Vercel or as traditional server-hosted applications on any web server that supports Node.js.

In summary, Blade is a templating engine primarily used for PHP web development within the Laravel framework, while Next.js is a comprehensive React framework that offers server-side rendering, routing, and data fetching capabilities. Next.js provides more flexibility in terms of rendering options, routing, and navigation, while Blade benefits from the extensive PHP ecosystem and easy deployment options.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Advice on Blade, Next.js

Yucen

Feb 23, 2021

Decided

We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.

312k views312k

Comments

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Blade	Next.js
It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility.	Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
Lightweight; Modular; Supports plug-in extensions; Restful style routing; Embedded jetty server and template engine support; Supports JDK 1.6 and up	Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 135.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.7K
Stacks 50	Stacks 8.0K
Followers 83	Followers 5.1K
Votes 0	Votes 330
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
No integrations available	React

What are some alternatives to Blade, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.