StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Blueprint vs Draggable JS

Blueprint vs Draggable JS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Blueprint
Blueprint
Stacks34
Followers85
Votes9
GitHub Stars21.3K
Forks2.2K
Draggable JS
Draggable JS
Stacks53
Followers72
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.4K
Forks1.1K

Blueprint vs Draggable JS: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of web development, understanding the differences between Blueprint and Draggable JS is crucial for developers looking to implement drag-and-drop functionality on their websites.

  1. Functional Differences: One key difference between Blueprint and Draggable JS lies in their functionality. Blueprint focuses on providing a set of pre-defined components and patterns for creating consistent interfaces, while Draggable JS specifically caters to enabling Drag and Drop interactions on web pages.

  2. Customization Options: Blueprint offers limited customization options compared to Draggable JS, which allows developers to fine-tune and customize their drag-and-drop implementations with greater flexibility and control.

  3. Community Support: Draggable JS boasts a larger community and support system compared to Blueprint, making it easier for developers to find resources, tutorials, and assistance when working with the library.

  4. Documentation Quality: Blueprint is known for its comprehensive and well-organized documentation, which can be helpful for beginners to quickly get started. Draggable JS, on the other hand, may have more scattered or less detailed documentation, requiring a deeper understanding of the library.

  5. Compatibility: Blueprint may have better compatibility with certain front-end frameworks or libraries due to its components being designed with specific frameworks in mind. Draggable JS, on the other hand, is more framework-agnostic and can be used in a broader range of environments.

  6. Performance: When it comes to performance, Draggable JS may offer better optimization for handling drag-and-drop interactions efficiently, especially in complex scenarios with a high number of draggable elements.

In Summary, understanding the differences in functionality, customization, community support, documentation quality, compatibility, and performance between Blueprint and Draggable JS is crucial for developers looking to implement drag-and-drop functionality effectively on their websites.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Blueprint
Blueprint
Draggable JS
Draggable JS

Blueprint is a React UI toolkit for the web. It is optimized for building complex, data-dense web interfaces for desktop applications. If you rely heavily on mobile interactions and are looking for a mobile-first UI toolkit, this may not be for you.

Draggable is a modular drag & drop library, allowing you to start small and build up with the features you need. At its most basic, Draggable gives you drag & drop functionality, fast DOM reordering, accessible markup, and a bundle of events to grab on to.

-
Works with native drag, mouse, touch and force touch events;Can extend dragging behaviour by hooking into draggables event life cycle;Can extend drag detection by adding sensors to draggable;The library is targeted ES6 first
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.3K
GitHub Stars
18.4K
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
34
Stacks
53
Followers
85
Followers
72
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Documentation is very well done
  • 2
    Awesome components
  • 2
    Great
  • 1
    Great app
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
ES6
ES6

What are some alternatives to Blueprint, Draggable JS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase