StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Kendo UI

Bootstrap vs Kendo UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K

Bootstrap vs Kendo UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bootstrap and Kendo UI are both popular frameworks used for developing web applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Responsive Design: Bootstrap is renowned for its responsive web design capabilities. It provides a grid system that allows developers to create responsive layouts easily. On the other hand, Kendo UI does not offer a built-in grid system and focuses more on providing a rich set of UI components for building desktop-like web applications.

  2. Themes and Styling: Bootstrap comes with a set of pre-designed themes and styles which can be easily customized to suit the project's needs. It provides a wide range of CSS classes that can be used to style the elements. In contrast, Kendo UI offers a diverse collection of professional-looking themes and provides built-in support for skinning and theming, making it convenient for developers to create visually appealing applications.

  3. Component Library: Bootstrap primarily focuses on providing a comprehensive library of reusable UI components such as buttons, forms, navigation bars, and more. It offers a rich set of components, making it easier for developers to build web applications quickly. On the other hand, Kendo UI provides a vast collection of advanced UI components, including charts, grids, calendars, and more, which are specifically designed for complex enterprise-level applications.

  4. JavaScript Framework: Bootstrap is primarily a CSS framework and relies on JavaScript plugins for advanced interactive features. It uses jQuery as its primary JavaScript library. In contrast, Kendo UI is a complete JavaScript framework that includes both CSS and advanced JavaScript components. It has its own JavaScript library, which offers powerful features like data binding, MVVM architecture, and more.

  5. License and Pricing: Bootstrap is an open-source framework released under the MIT license, allowing developers to use it for free in their projects. It is freely available, making it highly cost-effective for both personal and commercial use. Kendo UI, on the other hand, is a commercial framework offered by Telerik, a subsidiary of Progress Software. It requires a license for commercial use and provides additional features and support options for paid users.

  6. Customizability and Extensibility: Bootstrap provides a high degree of customizability, allowing developers to easily modify the framework to meet the project's specific requirements. It offers a wide range of customization options such as variables, mixins, and more. Kendo UI also offers customization options but to a lesser extent compared to Bootstrap. It provides a theme builder tool that allows developers to customize the existing themes but has less flexibility in terms of modifying the core components.

In Summary, Bootstrap is a responsive CSS framework with a focus on responsive design and a comprehensive library of UI components, while Kendo UI is a JavaScript framework with advanced UI components and built-in support for theming and styling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Kendo UI

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Kendo UI
Kendo UI

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
297
Followers
13.2K
Followers
359
Votes
7.7K
Votes
33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 2
    AngularJS
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 1
    Awdawd
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Kendo UI?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase