StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Bower vs hierarchical-clustering

Bower vs hierarchical-clustering

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bower
Bower
Stacks6.4K
Followers4.5K
Votes927
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks1.8K
hierarchical-clustering
hierarchical-clustering
Stacks0
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bower
Bower
hierarchical-clustering
hierarchical-clustering

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

This package provides a function to create a dendrogram from a list of items and a distance function between them. Initially a singleton cluster is created for each item, and then new, bigger clusters are created by merging the two clusters with least distance between them. The distance between two clusters is calculated according to the linkage type. The dendrogram represents not only the clusters but also the order on which they were created. This package has many implementations with different performance characteristics. There are SLINK and CLINK algorithm implementations that are optimal in both space and time. There are also naive implementations using a distance matrix. Using the dendrogram function from Data.Clustering.Hierarchical automatically chooses the best implementation we have. Changes in version 0.4.4: Remove most upper bounds. Changes in version 0.4: Specialize the distance type to Double for efficiency reasons. It's uncommon to use distances other than Double. Implement SLINK and CLINK. These are optimal algorithms in both space and time for single and complete linkage, respectively, running in O(n^2) time and O(n) space. Reorganized internal implementation. Some performance improvements for the naive implementation. Better test coverage. Also, performance improvements for the test suite, now running in 3 seconds (instead of one minute). Changes in version 0.3.1.2 (version 0.3.1.1 was skipped): Added tests for many things. Use cabal test =). Changes in version 0.3.1: Works with containers 0.4 (thanks, Doug Beardsley). Removed some internal unnecessary overheads and added some strictness. Changes in version 0.3.0.1: Listed changes of unreleased version 0.2. Changes in version 0.3: Added function cutAt. Fixed complexity in Haddock comments. Changes in version 0.2: Added function elements. Added separate functions for each linkage type. This may be useful if you want to create a dendrogram and your distance data type isn't an instance of Floating.

Bower operates at a lower level than previous attempts at client-side package management – such as Jam, Volo, or Ender. These managers could consume Bower as a dependency.;Bower's aim is simply to install packages, resolve dependencies from a bower.json, check versions, and then provide an API which reports on these things. Nothing more. This is a major diversion from past attempts at browser package management.;Bower offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of package management, while exposing an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
6.4K
Stacks
0
Followers
4.5K
Followers
0
Votes
927
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 483
    Package management
  • 214
    Open source
  • 142
    Simple
  • 53
    Great for for project dependencies injection
  • 27
    Web components with Meteor
Cons
  • 2
    Deprecated
  • 1
    Front end only
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Bower, hierarchical-clustering?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

fpm

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana