StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. BrowserSync vs Webpack

BrowserSync vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
BrowserSync
BrowserSync
Stacks127
Followers140
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.3K
Forks754

BrowserSync vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Key Differences between BrowserSync and Webpack

BrowserSync and Webpack are two popular tools used in web development. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Build vs Runtime: The main difference between BrowserSync and Webpack lies in their purpose. Webpack is primarily a module bundler and build tool, used for managing and optimizing the front-end assets of a web application. On the other hand, BrowserSync is a runtime tool that allows you to keep multiple browsers and devices in sync while developing a website.

  2. Hot Reloading vs Live Reloading: Webpack offers hot reloading, which means that it can update a running application without a full page reload. This makes development faster and more efficient, as only the modules that have changed are updated. BrowserSync, on the other hand, provides live reloading, which automatically refreshes the browser when changes are made to the source code.

  3. Code Splitting vs Syncing: Webpack allows for code splitting, which enables you to split your code into smaller chunks and load them on demand. This can significantly improve the performance of your application by reducing the initial load time. BrowserSync, on the other hand, focuses on syncing actions like scroll, click, form input, and file changes across multiple connected browsers.

  4. Configuration Complexity: Webpack has a steep learning curve and can be more complex to configure compared to BrowserSync. It requires setting up a configuration file with various loaders, plugins, and modules, which can be overwhelming for beginners. BrowserSync, on the other hand, is relatively easy to set up and requires minimal configuration.

  5. Dependency Management: Webpack includes a powerful dependency management system that allows you to manage complex module dependencies and import styles, scripts, and other assets directly into your code. BrowserSync does not handle module dependencies and is mainly focused on synchronizing browsers and providing live reloading functionality.

  6. Watching and Bundling: Webpack includes a file watcher that allows you to automatically rebuild your application when changes are made to the source code. It also bundles the assets together for deployment. BrowserSync, on the other hand, does not include a file watcher or bundling feature. It relies on a separate build tool like Grunt or Gulp to perform these tasks.

In summary, Webpack is primarily a build tool that focuses on optimizing and bundling front-end assets, while BrowserSync is a runtime tool that provides live syncing and reloading functionality. The choice between them depends on your specific needs and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, BrowserSync

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
BrowserSync
BrowserSync

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

BrowserSync makes your tweaking and testing faster by synchronising file changes and interactions across multiple devices. It’s wicked-fast and totally free.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Interaction sync;File sync;URL history;Remote inspector;UI or CLI control;Build-tool compatible;URL tunneling;Free to run and reuse
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
12.3K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
754
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
127
Followers
28.1K
Followers
140
Votes
752
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Grunt
Grunt
gulp
gulp

What are some alternatives to Webpack, BrowserSync?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

CodeKit

CodeKit

Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.

Prepros

Prepros

It is an interface tool which handles pre-processing, and other front-end tasks. Its greatest strength is the incredible ease with which it allows you to use pre-processors of various kinds, be they for CSS, HTML or JavaScript.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana