StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. C# vs Classic ASP

C# vs Classic ASP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C#
C#
Stacks70.1K
Followers46.3K
Votes2.2K
Classic ASP
Classic ASP
Stacks76
Followers75
Votes24

C# vs Classic ASP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown formatted content, we will discuss the key differences between C# and Classic ASP, providing specific details about each difference and extracting any generic sentences. We will present the differences in a numbered format and summarize the main points at the end.

  1. Memory Management: In C#, memory management is automatic through the use of the .NET runtime environment. It provides a garbage collector that takes care of memory allocation and deallocation, relieving developers from manual memory management tasks. However, in Classic ASP, memory management is the responsibility of the developer, requiring explicit coding and proper disposal of objects.

  2. Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Support: C# is a fully object-oriented programming language with support for features like encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism. It provides built-in language constructs to create and manipulate objects. On the other hand, Classic ASP is a scripting language that lacks comprehensive support for OOP concepts. It primarily focuses on procedural programming, making it less suitable for large-scale projects that require complex object-oriented designs.

  3. Type Safety: C# is a statically typed language, which means that the type of variables needs to be declared explicitly at compile-time. The compiler checks for type compatibility and issues errors at build time if any mismatch is detected. In contrast, Classic ASP is dynamically typed, allowing variables to hold values of any type without explicit declaration. While this flexibility may simplify code writing, it can also lead to type-related errors that are only discovered at runtime.

  4. Platform Independence: C# is a language that runs on the .NET platform, providing a certain degree of platform independence. .NET applications can run on different operating systems, such as Windows, macOS, or Linux, as long as the respective .NET runtime is available. In contrast, Classic ASP is Windows-centric and tightly integrated with Internet Information Services (IIS). It is primarily designed for Windows-based servers and doesn't offer the same level of cross-platform compatibility.

  5. Performance and Scalability: C# is a compiled language that gets translated into machine code, resulting in better performance and scalability compared to Classic ASP, which is interpreted at runtime. Additionally, C# benefits from the extensive optimization capabilities provided by the .NET runtime, allowing efficient memory usage and faster execution. Classic ASP, being a scripting language, may suffer from slower execution speeds and limited optimizations.

  6. Community and Development Support: C# is widely adopted and has a large and active developer community. It is backed by Microsoft and benefits from regular updates, new features, and a rich set of development tools. Classic ASP, although still used in some legacy systems, has significantly fewer resources available. The community support and development tools for Classic ASP are not as extensive or up-to-date as those available for C#.

In summary, C# offers automatic memory management, comprehensive OOP support, a statically typed system, platform independence to some extent, better performance, and a larger developer community compared to Classic ASP, which requires manual memory management, lacks extensive OOP support, is dynamically typed, tied to Windows platforms, may have performance limitations, and has limited community and development support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C#, Classic ASP

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Erik
Erik

Chief Architect at LiveTiles

May 18, 2020

Decided

C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.

614k views614k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C#
C#
Classic ASP
Classic ASP

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

It is a server-side scripting environment that you can use to create and run dynamic, interactive Web server applications. With ASP, you can combine HTML pages, script commands, and COM components to create interactive Web pages and powerful Web-based applications that are easy to develop and modify.

-
server-side execution environment; provides native support for both Microsoft JScript and VBScript
Statistics
Stacks
70.1K
Stacks
76
Followers
46.3K
Followers
75
Votes
2.2K
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 351
    Cool syntax
  • 294
    Great lambda support
  • 267
    Great generics support
  • 212
    Language integrated query (linq)
  • 181
    Extension methods
Cons
  • 15
    Poor x-platform GUI support
  • 8
    Closed source
  • 7
    Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma
  • 7
    Fast and secure
Pros
  • 5
    In real life faster than asp.net
  • 4
    All you need is a flat text editor as opposed to asp.ne
  • 4
    Easier to mix with html than php
  • 3
    Super easy to learn
  • 3
    Debug with IIS easily
Cons
  • 1
    No need to use MSQL
  • 1
    You need to develop your own session server function
  • 1
    Needs MS IIS and MS SQL ($$$)
  • 1
    Low status in most it communities
  • 1
    No Session Server required
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Perl
Perl
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to C#, Classic ASP?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase