Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
C# vs guava: What are the differences?
Introduction:
The following Markdown code provides key differences between C# and Guava, specifically focusing on the differences between the two programming languages. These differences are described in six specific paragraphs, each highlighting a distinct variation between C# and Guava.
1. C# Syntax: C# is a statically typed programming language that uses a C-style syntax. It includes features like properties, events, and indexers, allowing developers to write concise and efficient code. On the other hand, Guava is a Java library that introduces high-level functionality to the Java programming language, but it does not affect the syntax itself.
2. Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Support: C# is designed to be an object-oriented language, providing robust support for OOP principles such as inheritance, polymorphism, and encapsulation. In contrast, Guava does not directly influence the OOP support in Java, as it primarily focuses on providing utility classes, functional programming features, and data structures.
3. Exception Handling: C# offers a comprehensive exception handling mechanism, allowing developers to catch and handle runtime errors efficiently. It provides a powerful try-catch-finally model, custom exception classes, and the ability to handle exceptions at different levels of the call stack. While Guava does not directly provide its own exception handling mechanism, it can be used alongside Java's exception handling framework to enhance exception handling capabilities.
4. Collection Libraries: C# includes a wide range of collection libraries, such as the List, Dictionary, and HashSet, which provide various data structures and algorithms to manipulate and store data efficiently. Guava, on the other hand, expands upon Java's collection libraries by introducing additional data structures like Multisets, Multimaps, and BiMaps, along with utility methods for better collection manipulation.
5. Functional Programming Features: C# incorporates functional programming features, such as lambda expressions, LINQ (Language Integrated Query), and anonymous methods. These features enable developers to write expressive, concise, and more readable code. Guava complements Java's object-oriented nature by offering additional functional programming features, such as functional interfaces, the Optional class for handling nullable values, and functional idioms like Predicate, Supplier, and Function.
6. Language Ecosystem: C# is primarily associated with Microsoft's .NET ecosystem, which offers a wide range of development tools, frameworks, and libraries for building Windows applications, web applications, and services. Guava, being a Java library, is part of the larger Java ecosystem, which provides various tools, frameworks (such as Spring and Hibernate), and libraries for building enterprise-ready applications and platforms.
In summary, C# and Guava differ in their syntax, object-oriented programming support, exception handling mechanisms, collection libraries, functional programming features, and the ecosystems they are associated with. These variations highlight the distinct strengths and capabilities offered by each programming language and library.
In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.
To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.
Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.
For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.
That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.
We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.
As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.
C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.
Pros of C#
- Cool syntax351
- Great lambda support293
- Great generics support265
- Language integrated query (linq)211
- Extension methods180
- Automatic garbage collection94
- Properties with get/set methods89
- Backed by microsoft84
- Automatic memory management71
- Amaizing Crossplatform Support61
- High performance46
- LINQ43
- Beautiful38
- Great ecosystem of community packages with Nuget35
- Vibrant developer community27
- Great readability24
- Dead-simple asynchronous programming with async/await21
- Visual Studio - Great IDE19
- Open source17
- Productive16
- Strongly typed by default, dynamic typing when needed15
- Object oriented programming paradigm15
- Easy separation of config/application code12
- Great community11
- OOPS simplified with great syntax10
- Operator overloading9
- Cool9
- Good language to teach OO concepts8
- High-performance8
- Events management using delegates8
- Unity7
- Linq expressions7
- Conditional compilation6
- Coherent language backed by an extensive CLR6
- Top level code5
- Organized and clean5
- Comprehensive platform libraries5
- Concise syntax, productivity designed4
- Lovely3
- Statically typed2
- Far more sleek and sphisticated than other languages1
- Simple and Readable1
- Sophisticated overall1
- Interfaces1
- Interfaces0
Pros of guava
- Interface Driven API5
- Easy to setup1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of C#
- Poor x-platform GUI support15
- Closed source8
- Fast and secure7
- Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma7