StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. C# vs JetBrains MPS

C# vs JetBrains MPS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C#
C#
Stacks70.1K
Followers46.3K
Votes2.2K
JetBrains MPS
JetBrains MPS
Stacks7
Followers15
Votes4
GitHub Stars1.6K
Forks307

C# vs JetBrains MPS: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax and Language Features: C# is a statically-typed language with a rich set of syntax and language features. It uses curly braces {} to define blocks of code, and is heavily influenced by C and C++. JetBrains MPS, on the other hand, is a language workbench that allows for the creation of domain-specific languages (DSLs). It uses a projectional editor to define and manipulate code, which provides a more flexible and customizable syntax.
  2. Tooling and Development Environment: C# is primarily built on Microsoft's .NET platform and has a wide range of tooling and development environments available, such as Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code. JetBrains MPS, on the other hand, provides its own development environment specifically designed for creating and working with DSLs. It offers features like projectional editing, code generation, and language extensions.
  3. Code Generation and Transformation: C# follows a traditional approach to code generation, where code is written directly by the programmer and compiled into executable binaries. JetBrains MPS takes a different approach by allowing for the generation and transformation of code based on defined language specifications. This enables the creation of highly specialized and customizable code generators and transformers.
  4. Language Composition and Reusability: C# follows a modular approach to code organization, where reusable code is typically defined in the form of classes, objects, and libraries. JetBrains MPS allows for the composition and reuse of language concepts, which enables the creation of domain-specific languages that are tailored to specific problem domains. This promotes code reusability at the language level.
  5. Language Extensibility and Customization: C# provides the ability to extend the language through the use of libraries and frameworks. However, this extension is limited to the capabilities of the language itself. JetBrains MPS, on the other hand, allows for the customization and extension of languages at a much deeper level. It provides a language workbench that enables the creation and modification of language specifications, making it highly extensible and customizable.
  6. Maturity and Ecosystem: C# is a widely used language with a large and mature ecosystem. It has a vast library of third-party frameworks and tools available for developers. JetBrains MPS, while not as widely adopted as C#, provides a unique and powerful toolset for language engineering. It has its own ecosystem of language plugins and extensions, allowing for the creation and sharing of DSLs within the MPS community.

In Summary, C# and JetBrains MPS differ in syntax, tooling, code generation, language composition, extensibility, and ecosystem. C# is a general-purpose language with a rich set of syntax and language features, while JetBrains MPS is a language workbench that allows for the creation of domain-specific languages using a projectional editor and specialized development environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C#, JetBrains MPS

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Erik
Erik

Chief Architect at LiveTiles

May 18, 2020

Decided

C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.

614k views614k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C#
C#
JetBrains MPS
JetBrains MPS

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

It is a tool to design domain-specific languages. It uses projectional editing which allows users to overcome the limits of language parsers, and build DSL editors, such as ones with tables and diagrams. It implements language-oriented programming.

-
Domain-specific Language; Projectional Editor; Editor Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
307
Stacks
70.1K
Stacks
7
Followers
46.3K
Followers
15
Votes
2.2K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 351
    Cool syntax
  • 294
    Great lambda support
  • 267
    Great generics support
  • 212
    Language integrated query (linq)
  • 181
    Extension methods
Cons
  • 15
    Poor x-platform GUI support
  • 8
    Closed source
  • 7
    Fast and secure
  • 7
    Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma
Pros
  • 1
    Inherits language grammars due to no-parser model
  • 1
    An amazing tool to write DSLs
  • 1
    Translates custom language into Java or others
  • 1
    You can build your own programming language with IDE
  • 0
    An amazing tool to write DSLs and translate them into g
Cons
  • 1
    Steep entry curve (compiler writing skills)
  • 1
    Requires very accurate selling to customers
  • 1
    Unpopular so has a very small geek-like community
  • 1
    The base version provides only Java and plain text out
  • 1
    Does not provide graphical modeling languages input
Integrations
.NET
.NET
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to C#, JetBrains MPS?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase