StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. Caffe vs Chainer

Caffe vs Chainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Caffe
Caffe
Stacks66
Followers73
Votes0
GitHub Stars34.7K
Forks18.6K
Chainer
Chainer
Stacks17
Followers23
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks1.4K

Caffe vs Chainer: What are the differences?

  1. Data Parallelism Approach: Caffe follows a data parallelism approach where the computation graph is static and predefined, while Chainer supports dynamic computation graphs allowing for more flexibility in model development. This difference allows Chainer to have a more intuitive and flexible approach to defining and modifying models during training.

  2. Tensor Representation: Caffe represents tensors as blobs with fixed shapes and relies on a static computation graph, while Chainer treats data as multi-dimensional arrays and allows dynamic graph construction. This difference in tensor representation impacts the ease of handling variable input sizes and shapes in Chainer compared to Caffe.

  3. Development Language: Caffe is primarily developed in C++ and utilizes a C++ API, whereas Chainer is developed in Python and provides Python bindings. This difference can affect the ease of use and integration with other Python-based libraries and tools for machine learning tasks.

  4. GPU Integration: Both Caffe and Chainer offer GPU support for accelerated training, but Chainer provides more seamless integration with CUDA libraries for GPU computations. This distinction can lead to differences in performance and efficiency when running models on GPU hardware.

  5. Community Support: Caffe has a large and established community of users and contributors, while Chainer has a smaller but rapidly growing community. This variance in community size can impact the availability of resources, documentation, and community-driven extensions for both frameworks.

  6. Model Deployment: Caffe is often preferred for deployment in production environments due to its efficient inference capabilities and support for model optimization techniques, whereas Chainer is more commonly used during the research and development phase due to its flexibility and ease of experimentation with models. This difference in focus affects the suitability of each framework for different stages of the machine learning pipeline.

In Summary, the key differences between Caffe and Chainer lie in their approach to data parallelism, tensor representation, development language, GPU integration, community support, and model deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Caffe
Caffe
Chainer
Chainer

It is a deep learning framework made with expression, speed, and modularity in mind.

It is an open source deep learning framework written purely in Python on top of Numpy and CuPy Python libraries aiming at flexibility. It supports CUDA computation. It only requires a few lines of code to leverage a GPU. It also runs on multiple GPUs with little effort.

Extensible code; Speed; Community;
Supports CUDA computation;Runs on multiple GPUs ;Supports various network architectures ;Supports per-batch architectures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
34.7K
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Forks
18.6K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
66
Stacks
17
Followers
73
Followers
23
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
TensorFlow
TensorFlow
Keras
Keras
Amazon SageMaker
Amazon SageMaker
Pythia
Pythia
Python
Python
NumPy
NumPy
CUDA
CUDA

What are some alternatives to Caffe, Chainer?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope