StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CakePHP vs FuelPHP

CakePHP vs FuelPHP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CakePHP
CakePHP
Stacks672
Followers401
Votes137
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks3.4K
FuelPHP
FuelPHP
Stacks23
Followers34
Votes5

CakePHP vs FuelPHP: What are the differences?

Introduction

CakePHP and FuelPHP are both popular PHP frameworks used for web application development. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture:

    • CakePHP follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern, which separates the application into three main components: the model (data handling), the view (presentation), and the controller (logic flow).
    • FuelPHP, on the other hand, follows a Hierarchical Model View Controller (HMVC) pattern, which allows for modular and reusable components, making it easier to handle complex applications.
  2. Coding Style:

    • CakePHP follows a strict convention over configuration approach, which means developers need to follow predefined conventions to ensure a smooth development process. This can be beneficial for team collaboration and code maintainability.
    • FuelPHP, on the other hand, provides more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to choose their own coding style and configuration preferences.
  3. Community and Support:

    • CakePHP has a larger and more mature community, with a wide range of resources, documentation, and plugins available. It has been around for a longer time and has a more established reputation in the PHP community.
    • FuelPHP, while not as popular as CakePHP, still has an active community and support. However, it may be more challenging to find extensive resources and community-driven solutions compared to CakePHP.
  4. Performance and Speed:

    • CakePHP is known for its fast development speed, as it provides a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities and conventions that reduce the need for manual coding. It also has a mature caching system that can improve performance.
    • FuelPHP, on the other hand, focuses on providing a high-performance framework, with optimizations for speed and memory usage. It aims to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for projects that require faster execution.
  5. Database ORM:

    • CakePHP uses its own Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) system called "CakePHP ORM," which simplifies database interactions and allows for easy database queries and manipulations.
    • FuelPHP uses a different ORM called "ORM," which also provides similar functionalities but with some differences in syntax and usage. It offers a more granular control over database operations.
  6. Documentation and Learning Curve:

    • CakePHP has extensive documentation, tutorials, and a well-structured learning curve, making it relatively easy for beginners to get started and learn the framework quickly.
    • FuelPHP, on the other hand, may have slightly less documentation and learning resources available, making it potentially more challenging for beginners to grasp the framework and its concepts.

In summary, the key differences between CakePHP and FuelPHP lie in their architectural patterns, coding styles, community support, performance focus, database ORM systems, and documentation/resources provided. While CakePHP is more popular, follows strict conventions, and has a larger community, FuelPHP offers flexibility, speed optimizations, and a lightweight approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CakePHP, FuelPHP

Michael
Michael

Developer at Fleet-Nomics

Sep 11, 2022

Needs adviceonBubbleBubbleCodeIgniterCodeIgniterCakePHPCakePHP

Hi all, I need to create a simple IoT interface application that connects the end device API with a GeoTab API. I am considering using Bubble due to its simple interface and configuration tools, but I fear it's too simple. We will want to add features and new devices as we grow - I was thinking of using CodeIgniter or CakePHP on a hosted site for the application. Must support JCOM encoding between the two APIs and there is no need for a separate interface as GeoTab already has one; we are just connecting and pushing data. Thoughts?

47.4k views47.4k
Comments
Juan Jose
Juan Jose

May 8, 2021

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

Hi, Which tool will you recommend:

I need to build a web application, oriented to small businesses, like a small ERP. It will have intensive use of Sql to access a PostgreSQL database. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory.

If you think another tool will be better, please let that know.

Thanks a lot

69.6k views69.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP
CakePHP
FuelPHP
FuelPHP

It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

FuelPHP is a fast, lightweight PHP 5.4 framework. In an age where frameworks are a dime a dozen, We believe that FuelPHP will stand out in the crowd. It will do this by combining all the things you love about the great frameworks out there, while getting rid of the bad.

Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
672
Stacks
23
Followers
401
Followers
34
Votes
137
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Open source
  • 25
    Really rapid framework
  • 19
    Good code organization
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 10
    Security best practices
Cons
  • 1
    Robust Baking Tool
  • 1
    Follows Good Programming Practices
Pros
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Supports HMVC
  • 1
    Fast and secure
Integrations
PHP
PHP
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, FuelPHP?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase