CakePHP vs Vapor

Overview

CakePHP

Stacks672

Followers401

Votes137

GitHub Stars8.8K

Forks3.4K

Vapor

Stacks117

Followers217

Votes65

CakePHP vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Architectural Difference: CakePHP follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, which helps in separating presentation, logic, and data layers. On the other hand, Vapor is a serverless deployment platform specifically designed for Laravel applications, providing scalability and ease of use through cloud services like AWS.
Language Support: CakePHP is written in PHP, making it easier for developers familiar with PHP to work on projects using this framework. In contrast, Vapor is tailored for Laravel applications written in PHP, offering optimized serverless deployment specifically for Laravel projects.
Scalability: CakePHP, being an MVC framework, provides a solid foundation for building scalable applications. Vapor, on the other hand, leverages serverless technology, allowing for automatic scaling based on application demand without the need for manual intervention in server management.
Deployment Environment: CakePHP applications are typically deployed on traditional web servers like Apache or Nginx, requiring configuration and maintenance. Vapor simplifies the deployment process by utilizing cloud services like AWS Lambda and API Gateway, reducing the need for managing servers and infrastructure.
Community and Support: CakePHP has a well-established community and a long history of development, providing a plethora of resources, plugins, and documentation. Vapor, being a newer addition to the Laravel ecosystem, is supported by the Laravel community and the team behind Laravel, offering dedicated support and resources for users.
Cost Consideration: CakePHP being an open-source framework, is cost-effective for development projects without additional cloud service expenses. Vapor, while offering scalability and ease of deployment, incurs costs based on AWS usage, which can vary depending on application usage and requirements.

In Summary, CakePHP and Vapor differ in architectural approach, language support, scalability, deployment environment, community support, and cost implications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP	Vapor
It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.	Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.
Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks	Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 672	Stacks 117
Followers 401	Followers 217
Votes 137	Votes 65
Pros & Cons
Pros 35 Open source 25 Really rapid framework 19 Good code organization 13 Flexibility 10 Security best practices Cons 1 Robust Baking Tool 1 Follows Good Programming Practices	Pros 13 Fast 11 Swift 10 Type-safe 6 Great for apis 5 Compiled to machine code Cons 1 Server side swift is still in its infancy 1 Not as much support available.
Integrations
PHP	Swift

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

CakePHP vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Architectural Difference: CakePHP follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, which helps in separating presentation, logic, and data layers. On the other hand, Vapor is a serverless deployment platform specifically designed for Laravel applications, providing scalability and ease of use through cloud services like AWS.
Language Support: CakePHP is written in PHP, making it easier for developers familiar with PHP to work on projects using this framework. In contrast, Vapor is tailored for Laravel applications written in PHP, offering optimized serverless deployment specifically for Laravel projects.
Scalability: CakePHP, being an MVC framework, provides a solid foundation for building scalable applications. Vapor, on the other hand, leverages serverless technology, allowing for automatic scaling based on application demand without the need for manual intervention in server management.
Deployment Environment: CakePHP applications are typically deployed on traditional web servers like Apache or Nginx, requiring configuration and maintenance. Vapor simplifies the deployment process by utilizing cloud services like AWS Lambda and API Gateway, reducing the need for managing servers and infrastructure.
Community and Support: CakePHP has a well-established community and a long history of development, providing a plethora of resources, plugins, and documentation. Vapor, being a newer addition to the Laravel ecosystem, is supported by the Laravel community and the team behind Laravel, offering dedicated support and resources for users.
Cost Consideration: CakePHP being an open-source framework, is cost-effective for development projects without additional cloud service expenses. Vapor, while offering scalability and ease of deployment, incurs costs based on AWS usage, which can vary depending on application usage and requirements.

In Summary, CakePHP and Vapor differ in architectural approach, language support, scalability, deployment environment, community support, and cost implications.

CakePHP vs Vapor

Overview