StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. CanJS vs Mithril

CanJS vs Mithril

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CanJS
CanJS
Stacks10
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.9K
Forks419
Mithril
Mithril
Stacks89
Followers79
Votes86

CanJS vs Mithril: What are the differences?

# Introduction
CanJS and Mithril are two popular JavaScript frameworks that are often used for building dynamic web applications. While both frameworks offer similar functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. **Architecture**:
CanJS follows the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) architecture, which separates the application into distinct components for models, views, and view-models. On the other hand, Mithril follows a more minimalistic approach with a Virtual DOM, allowing developers to create components using JavaScript functions.

2. **Learning Curve**:
CanJS tends to have a steeper learning curve compared to Mithril due to its extensive features and complex architecture. Mithril, on the other hand, is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it more beginner-friendly.

3. **Size**:
Mithril is significantly smaller in size compared to CanJS, making it a lightweight and efficient choice for projects where file size is a concern. CanJS, while feature-rich, can be heavier due to its comprehensive set of functionalities.

4. **Community Support**:
CanJS has a dedicated community that offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and support for developers. Mithril, while also having a supportive community, may not have as large of a user base as CanJS.

5. **Data Binding**:
CanJS provides two-way data binding out of the box, allowing for seamless synchronization of data between the model and view. Mithril, on the other hand, does not have built-in data binding and requires additional libraries or custom implementations for this functionality.

6. **Routing**:
CanJS comes with a built-in routing system that simplifies navigation within the application, while Mithril provides a flexible routing mechanism that allows developers to customize routing based on their specific requirements.

In Summary, CanJS and Mithril differ in their architecture, learning curve, size, community support, data binding capabilities, and routing mechanisms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CanJS
CanJS
Mithril
Mithril

CanJS is an evolving and improving set of client-side JavaScript architectural libraries that balances innovation and stability. It targets experienced developers building complex applications with long futures ahead of them.

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Community Driven Development; Tree-shakeable JavaScript Module Builds; Simple model mixins
Only 12kb gzipped, no dependencies;Small API, small learning curve;Safe-by-default templates;Hierarchical MVC via components;Virtual DOM diffing and compilable templates;Intelligent auto-redrawing system
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
419
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
10
Stacks
89
Followers
11
Followers
79
Votes
0
Votes
86
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 12
    Faster than React
  • 10
    Pure JavaScript
  • 10
    Virtual Dom
  • 8
    Robust
Cons
  • 1
    Virtual Dom
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Discourse
Discourse
AngularJS
AngularJS
Slack
Slack
npm
npm
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to CanJS, Mithril?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Durandal

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

Chaplin

Chaplin

Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase