Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cassandra

3.6K
3.5K
+ 1
507
MonetDB

13
35
+ 1
2
Add tool

Cassandra vs MonetDB: What are the differences?

## Introduction:
When choosing a database management system, it's crucial to understand the key differences between options like Cassandra and MonetDB. Here are the main differentiators between the two.

1. **Data Model**: Cassandra is a NoSQL database that uses a column-family data model, allowing for flexible schemas and horizontal scalability. On the other hand, MonetDB is a relational database that utilizes a traditional table-based data model with predefined schemas.

2. **Query Language**: Cassandra uses Cassandra Query Language (CQL) which is similar to SQL but has its own syntax and limitations due to its distributed architecture. MonetDB, being a relational database, uses standard SQL for querying, making it easier for users familiar with SQL to work with the database.

3. **Storage Format**: In Cassandra, data is stored in a wide-column format, optimized for write-heavy workloads and horizontal scaling. MonetDB, on the other hand, stores data in columnar format, offering better performance for analytical queries and aggregation operations.

4. **Consistency Model**: Cassandra employs eventual consistency by default, meaning that updates may not be immediately reflected across all nodes in the cluster. MonetDB, being an ACID-compliant relational database, ensures strong consistency by default, making it suitable for use cases where data integrity is a priority.

5. **Performance**: Cassandra is designed for high availability and fault-tolerance, making it suitable for applications requiring constant uptime and high availability. MonetDB, being optimized for analytical workloads, offers superior performance for complex queries and data analysis tasks.

6. **Use Cases**: Cassandra is often used for real-time applications, IoT, and big data analytics due to its scalability and fault-tolerance. MonetDB, on the other hand, is well-suited for OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) applications, data warehousing, and business intelligence tasks where complex queries and data aggregation are common.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Cassandra and MonetDB in terms of data model, query language, storage format, consistency model, performance, and use cases can help in making an informed decision based on specific requirements and use cases. 
Advice on Cassandra and MonetDB
Umair Iftikhar
Technical Architect at ERP Studio · | 3 upvotes · 461.8K views
Needs advice
on
CassandraCassandraDruidDruid
and
TimescaleDBTimescaleDB

Developing a solution that collects Telemetry Data from different devices, nearly 1000 devices minimum and maximum 12000. Each device is sending 2 packets in 1 second. This is time-series data, and this data definition and different reports are saved on PostgreSQL. Like Building information, maintenance records, etc. I want to know about the best solution. This data is required for Math and ML to run different algorithms. Also, data is raw without definitions and information stored in PostgreSQL. Initially, I went with TimescaleDB due to PostgreSQL support, but to increase in sites, I started facing many issues with timescale DB in terms of flexibility of storing data.

My major requirement is also the replication of the database for reporting and different purposes. You may also suggest other options other than Druid and Cassandra. But an open source solution is appreciated.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
MongoDBMongoDB

Hi Umair, Did you try MongoDB. We are using MongoDB on a production environment and collecting data from devices like your scenario. We have a MongoDB cluster with three replicas. Data from devices are being written to the master node and real-time dashboard UI is using the secondary nodes for read operations. With this setup write operations are not affected by read operations too.

See more
Vinay Mehta
Needs advice
on
CassandraCassandra
and
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

The problem I have is - we need to process & change(update/insert) 55M Data every 2 min and this updated data to be available for Rest API for Filtering / Selection. Response time for Rest API should be less than 1 sec.

The most important factors for me are processing and storing time of 2 min. There need to be 2 views of Data One is for Selection & 2. Changed data.

See more
Replies (4)
Recommends
on
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

Scylla can handle 1M/s events with a simple data model quite easily. The api to query is CQL, we have REST api but that's for control/monitoring

See more
Pankaj Soni
Chief Technical Officer at Software Joint · | 2 upvotes · 173.4K views
Recommends
on
CassandraCassandra

i love syclla for pet projects however it's license which is based on server model is an issue. thus i recommend cassandra

See more
Alex Peake
Recommends
on
CassandraCassandra

Cassandra is quite capable of the task, in a highly available way, given appropriate scaling of the system. Remember that updates are only inserts, and that efficient retrieval is only by key (which can be a complex key). Talking of keys, make sure that the keys are well distributed.

See more
Recommends
on
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

By 55M do you mean 55 million entity changes per 2 minutes? It is relatively high, means almost 460k per second. If I had to choose between Scylla or Cassandra, I would opt for Scylla as it is promising better performance for simple operations. However, maybe it would be worth to consider yet another alternative technology. Take into consideration required consistency, reliability and high availability and you may realize that there are more suitable once. Rest API should not be the main driver, because you can always develop the API yourself, if not supported by given technology.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cassandra
Pros of MonetDB
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 98
    High performance
  • 81
    High availability
  • 74
    Easy scalability
  • 53
    Replication
  • 26
    Reliable
  • 26
    Multi datacenter deployments
  • 10
    Schema optional
  • 9
    OLTP
  • 8
    Open source
  • 2
    Workload separation (via MDC)
  • 1
    Fast
  • 2
    High Performance

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cassandra
Cons of MonetDB
  • 3
    Reliability of replication
  • 1
    Size
  • 1
    Updates
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Cassandra?

    Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

    What is MonetDB?

    MonetDB innovates at all layers of a DBMS, e.g. a storage model based on vertical fragmentation, a modern CPU-tuned query execution architecture, automatic and self-tuning indexes, run-time query optimization, and a modular software architecture.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cassandra?
    What companies use MonetDB?
      No companies found
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Cassandra?
      What tools integrate with MonetDB?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Cassandra and MonetDB?
      HBase
      Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.
      Google Cloud Bigtable
      Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.
      Hadoop
      The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.
      Redis
      Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
      Couchbase
      Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.
      See all alternatives