StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Celery vs gevent

Celery vs gevent

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Celery
Celery
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes280
GitHub Stars27.5K
Forks4.9K
gevent
gevent
Stacks260
Followers52
Votes0

Celery vs gevent: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Celery and gevent are both popular Python libraries used for asynchronous programming. While both of them provide features for managing concurrent tasks, they have some key differences that developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. Scalability: Celery is designed for distributing tasks across multiple workers, making it more suitable for large-scale applications that require handling a high volume of tasks simultaneously. On the other hand, gevent is more lightweight and is ideal for applications that need to handle a moderate number of concurrent connections efficiently.

2. Programming Model: Celery follows a task queue model where tasks are sent to a centralized queue and executed by worker processes. In contrast, gevent is based on the greenlet library, which uses a cooperative multitasking approach within a single thread to switch between different tasks without blocking.

3. Dependency Management: Celery requires a message broker such as RabbitMQ or Redis to manage the communication between the client and workers. In contrast, gevent does not rely on any external services and can be used independently without the need for additional components.

4. Error Handling: Celery provides built-in mechanisms for retrying failed tasks, setting timeouts, and monitoring task execution. On the other hand, gevent's error handling is more manual and requires developers to implement their own error recovery strategies within the application code.

5. Performance Overhead: Celery introduces additional overhead due to its message queue architecture, which can impact the overall performance of the application, especially in scenarios with high task throughput. In comparison, gevent's lightweight nature results in lower overhead and better performance for applications that prioritize speed and responsiveness.

6. Ecosystem and Community Support: Celery has a larger ecosystem with support for various integrations, plugins, and extensions, making it easier to extend its functionality for different use cases. In contrast, gevent has a smaller community but is known for its simplicity and ease of use for basic asynchronous programming tasks.

In Summary, Celery and gevent offer distinct approaches to asynchronous programming, with Celery focusing on scalability and robust task management, while gevent prioritizes lightweight efficiency and simplicity in handling concurrent tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Celery
Celery
gevent
gevent

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

It is a coroutine -based Python networking library that uses greenlet to provide a high-level synchronous API on top of the libev or libuv event loop.

-
Fast event loop based on libev or libuv; Lightweight execution units based on greenlets; API that re-uses concepts from the Python standard library (for examples there are events and queues); Cooperative sockets with SSL support; Cooperative DNS queries performed through a threadpool, dnspython, or c-ares; Monkey patching utility to get 3rd party modules to become cooperative; TCP/UDP/HTTP servers; Subprocess support (through gevent.subprocess); Thread pools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
260
Followers
1.6K
Followers
52
Votes
280
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Task queue
  • 63
    Python integration
  • 40
    Django integration
  • 30
    Scheduled Task
  • 19
    Publish/subsribe
Cons
  • 4
    Sometimes loses tasks
  • 1
    Depends on broker
Cons
  • 1
    Not native
Integrations
No integrations available
Django
Django
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Celery, gevent?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase