Checkmarx vs Snyk

Overview

Snyk

Stacks580

Followers380

Votes20

Checkmarx

Stacks84

Followers135

Votes0

Checkmarx vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this article, we will compare Checkmarx and Snyk, two popular security testing tools, and highlight their key differences.

Supported Languages: Checkmarx supports a wide range of programming languages including Java, C#, C++, Python, Ruby, and more, making it suitable for a variety of projects. On the other hand, Snyk primarily focuses on supporting JavaScript and its related frameworks, which makes it especially valuable for web applications developed using these technologies.
Static Analysis vs. Developer-Centric Testing: Checkmarx primarily utilizes static analysis techniques to identify code vulnerabilities and potential security risks. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the source code, including detecting code-level vulnerabilities and insecure configurations. In contrast, Snyk focuses on developer-centric testing, integrating into the developer workflow and providing real-time vulnerability scanning and patching during development and deployment processes.
Integration and Automation: Checkmarx provides integrations with various Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) and continuous integration tools like Jenkins and TeamCity. It allows for automatic scanning during the development stage and integrates well with existing development workflows. On the other hand, Snyk also offers integrations with popular CI/CD tools but focuses on providing seamless integration and automation within developer-driven platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, and others.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: Checkmarx is a proprietary tool that offers a comprehensive set of features and support but requires licensing. Snyk, on the other hand, is based on an open-source model and provides free access for scanning open-source projects, making it an attractive choice for open-source developers.
Vulnerability Databases and Intelligence: Checkmarx has its own vulnerability database and intelligence platform, which provides insights into emerging threats and zero-day vulnerabilities. It offers customized dashboards and reporting capabilities for advanced vulnerability management. In contrast, Snyk leverages multiple vulnerability databases and intelligence sources to provide comprehensive vulnerability information for open-source dependencies.
Remediation Guidance and Developer Training: Checkmarx offers detailed remediation guidance for identified vulnerabilities, helping developers to understand the root causes and suggesting steps to fix the issues. It also offers training programs tailored for developers to improve their secure coding practices. Snyk, although it provides some remediation guidance, primarily focuses on assisting developers with automatically applying patches and providing actionable insights within their development environments.

In Summary, Checkmarx is a comprehensive static analysis tool with broad language support and extensive vulnerability management capabilities. Snyk, on the other hand, focuses on developer-centric testing, providing real-time vulnerability scanning and tight integration with developer tools, making it a suitable choice for JavaScript-based web applications and open-source projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Snyk, Checkmarx

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk	Checkmarx
Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform	It is a provider of state-of-the-art application security solution: static code analysis software, seamlessly integrated into development process.
-	Evaluate Your Exposure with a Holistic Platform; Gain Full Visibility; Secure Your Entire SDLC; Empower Your Developers; Determine Your Acceptable Risk
Statistics
Stacks 580	Stacks 84
Followers 380	Followers 135
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 False positives 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring 1 No malware detection	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java	Jenkins Gradle Bitbucket Travis CI TeamCity Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Snyk, Checkmarx?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

Checkmarx vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this article, we will compare Checkmarx and Snyk, two popular security testing tools, and highlight their key differences.

Supported Languages: Checkmarx supports a wide range of programming languages including Java, C#, C++, Python, Ruby, and more, making it suitable for a variety of projects. On the other hand, Snyk primarily focuses on supporting JavaScript and its related frameworks, which makes it especially valuable for web applications developed using these technologies.
Static Analysis vs. Developer-Centric Testing: Checkmarx primarily utilizes static analysis techniques to identify code vulnerabilities and potential security risks. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the source code, including detecting code-level vulnerabilities and insecure configurations. In contrast, Snyk focuses on developer-centric testing, integrating into the developer workflow and providing real-time vulnerability scanning and patching during development and deployment processes.
Integration and Automation: Checkmarx provides integrations with various Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) and continuous integration tools like Jenkins and TeamCity. It allows for automatic scanning during the development stage and integrates well with existing development workflows. On the other hand, Snyk also offers integrations with popular CI/CD tools but focuses on providing seamless integration and automation within developer-driven platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, and others.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: Checkmarx is a proprietary tool that offers a comprehensive set of features and support but requires licensing. Snyk, on the other hand, is based on an open-source model and provides free access for scanning open-source projects, making it an attractive choice for open-source developers.
Vulnerability Databases and Intelligence: Checkmarx has its own vulnerability database and intelligence platform, which provides insights into emerging threats and zero-day vulnerabilities. It offers customized dashboards and reporting capabilities for advanced vulnerability management. In contrast, Snyk leverages multiple vulnerability databases and intelligence sources to provide comprehensive vulnerability information for open-source dependencies.
Remediation Guidance and Developer Training: Checkmarx offers detailed remediation guidance for identified vulnerabilities, helping developers to understand the root causes and suggesting steps to fix the issues. It also offers training programs tailored for developers to improve their secure coding practices. Snyk, although it provides some remediation guidance, primarily focuses on assisting developers with automatically applying patches and providing actionable insights within their development environments.

Checkmarx vs Snyk

Overview