Checkmk vs Monit

Overview

Checkmk

Stacks77

Followers99

Votes0

Monit

Stacks166

Followers54

Votes0

Checkmk vs Monit: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Checkmk and Monit are two popular monitoring tools used to monitor the health and performance of servers and services. While they both serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between them that make each tool unique in its own way.

Installation and Configuration: Checkmk is a comprehensive monitoring solution that requires a more complex installation process and configuration. It offers a wide range of features and supports various platforms, making it suitable for larger environments. On the other hand, Monit is a lightweight monitoring tool that is easier to install and configure. It focuses on basic monitoring tasks and is more suitable for smaller environments.
Functionality: Checkmk provides a plethora of built-in features and monitoring options, including performance monitoring, event handling, alerting, and reporting. It supports a wide range of plugins and supports monitoring of various services and protocols. Monit, however, offers a more simplified set of functionalities compared to Checkmk. It primarily focuses on monitoring processes, file systems, and network connectivity.
User Interface: Checkmk offers a feature-rich web-based user interface that provides comprehensive monitoring dashboards, customizable views, and detailed reporting. It allows users to easily navigate through different sections and view real-time monitoring data. On the other hand, Monit has a simpler web interface that provides basic monitoring information in an easy-to-understand format. It may lack some of the advanced visualization and reporting capabilities offered by Checkmk.
Alerting and Notification: Checkmk provides advanced alerting and notification options, allowing users to configure notification rules based on various criteria such as severity, time periods, and escalation levels. It supports integration with various notification methods like email, SMS, and mobile apps. Monit, on the other hand, offers basic alerting capabilities, sending notifications via email only.
Scalability: Checkmk is designed to handle larger environments and can efficiently monitor hundreds or even thousands of hosts. It provides distributed monitoring options with centralized management capabilities. Monit, on the other hand, is more suitable for small to medium-sized environments with a limited number of hosts and services to monitor.
Community Support and Documentation: Checkmk has a large and active community of users, offering extensive online documentation, tutorials, and forums for support and troubleshooting. It also has a commercial version with professional support options. Monit, while having a smaller community, still provides decent documentation and resources for users to seek help.

In Summary, Checkmk and Monit are both powerful monitoring tools with different strengths. Checkmk provides a comprehensive solution with advanced features, scalability, and a rich user interface, suitable for larger environments. Monit, on the other hand, offers a lightweight and easy-to-use monitoring solution, ideal for smaller environments with simpler monitoring requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Checkmk, Monit

Shoaib

Dec 23, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, I have a simple script that dynamically spawns independent processes (through bash). Which tool should I use to monitor the spawned processes assuming I have the PIDs(/pid files) of the spawned processes? Monit seems to be useful for monitoring pre-configured processes but I need something for monitoring dynamic PID/PID files. Prometheus seems to be needing HTTP endpoints. A beginner

62.7k views62.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Checkmk	Monit
Checkmk is a comprehensive solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors.	It can monitor and manage distributed computer systems, conduct automatic maintenance and repair and execute meaningful causal actions in error situations.
State-based monitoring; Log- and event-based monitoring;Graphing and analytics;Customizable GUI;Reporting;Business Intelligence;Hardware and software inventory;Notifications and alert handler;Rule-based configuration, auto-discovery and agent deployment; Scalability; User Management with LDAP/Active Directory;Predictive Monitoring; Capacity Management; Single Sign-On; Dynamic host configuration	Responsive UI; Control Services Remotely; Services Monitoring modes
Statistics
Stacks 77	Stacks 166
Followers 99	Followers 54
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack FreeBSD HipChat Pushover

What are some alternatives to Checkmk, Monit?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Checkmk vs Monit: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Installation and Configuration: Checkmk is a comprehensive monitoring solution that requires a more complex installation process and configuration. It offers a wide range of features and supports various platforms, making it suitable for larger environments. On the other hand, Monit is a lightweight monitoring tool that is easier to install and configure. It focuses on basic monitoring tasks and is more suitable for smaller environments.
Functionality: Checkmk provides a plethora of built-in features and monitoring options, including performance monitoring, event handling, alerting, and reporting. It supports a wide range of plugins and supports monitoring of various services and protocols. Monit, however, offers a more simplified set of functionalities compared to Checkmk. It primarily focuses on monitoring processes, file systems, and network connectivity.
User Interface: Checkmk offers a feature-rich web-based user interface that provides comprehensive monitoring dashboards, customizable views, and detailed reporting. It allows users to easily navigate through different sections and view real-time monitoring data. On the other hand, Monit has a simpler web interface that provides basic monitoring information in an easy-to-understand format. It may lack some of the advanced visualization and reporting capabilities offered by Checkmk.
Alerting and Notification: Checkmk provides advanced alerting and notification options, allowing users to configure notification rules based on various criteria such as severity, time periods, and escalation levels. It supports integration with various notification methods like email, SMS, and mobile apps. Monit, on the other hand, offers basic alerting capabilities, sending notifications via email only.
Scalability: Checkmk is designed to handle larger environments and can efficiently monitor hundreds or even thousands of hosts. It provides distributed monitoring options with centralized management capabilities. Monit, on the other hand, is more suitable for small to medium-sized environments with a limited number of hosts and services to monitor.
Community Support and Documentation: Checkmk has a large and active community of users, offering extensive online documentation, tutorials, and forums for support and troubleshooting. It also has a commercial version with professional support options. Monit, while having a smaller community, still provides decent documentation and resources for users to seek help.

Checkmk vs Monit

Overview